Purpose: Determine whether standardized template reporting for the preoperative assessment of potential living renal transplant donors improves the comprehensiveness of radiology reports to meet the needs of urologists performing renal transplants. Methods: Urologist and radiologist stakeholders from renal transplant centers in our province ratified a standardized reporting template for evaluation of potential renal donors. Three centers (A, B, and C) were designated “intervention” groups. Center D was the control group, given employment of a site-specific standardized template prior to study commencement. Up to 100 consecutive CT scan reports per center, pre- and post-implementation of standardized reporting, were evaluated for reporting specific outcome measures. Results: At baseline, all intervention groups demonstrated poor reporting of urologist-desired outcome measures. Center A discussed 5/13 variables (38%), Center B discussed 6/13 variables (46%), and Center C only discussed 1/13 variables (8%) with ≥90% reliability. The control group exhibited consistent reporting, with 11/13 variables (85%) reported at ≥90% reliability. All institutions in the intervention group exhibited excellent compliance to structured reporting post-template implementation (Centers A = 95%, B = 100%, and C = 77%, respectively). Additionally, all intervention centers demonstrated a significant improvement in the comprehensiveness of reports post-template implementation, with statistically significant increases in the reporting of all variables under-reported at baseline ( P > .01). Conclusion: Standardized templates across our province for CT scans of potential renal donors promote completeness of reports. Radiologists can reliably provide our surgical colleagues with needed preoperative anatomy and incidental findings, helping to determine suitable transplant donors and reduce potential complications associated with organ retrieval.