JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. National Council on Family Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Marriage and Family.We address the assumption that aid, contact, and intimacy are components of some underlying dyadic construct by examining two mother-daughter relationships-student women and their mothers (132 pairs) and middle-aged women and their mothers (107 pairs). Both partners are respondents in each case. We distinguish between proximal aid and distal aid, include all modes of contact, and measure intimacy as a multidimensional construct. Aid and contact collectively do not account for more than 11% of the variance in reports of intimacy. With small but consistent associations across relationship reports, proximal aid to mother predicts both mother's and daughter's reports of intimacy in both generational pairs. In the younger but not the older pairs, the connection between intimacy and contact by visiting and telephoning is conditional on geographic distance. Amount of contact is related negatively to mothers' reported intimacy in the younger relationship and, when proximal aid to mother is controlled, to both mothers' and daughters' reported intimacy in the older relationship. This effect contradicts the assumption of a positive relationship between contact and intimacy. In both mother-daughter relationships, distal aid to mother, aid in general from mother to daughter, letter writing, and child care are not related to intimacy. It is not reasonable, therefore, to infer intimacy from aid and contact. The study suggests the potential of distinguishing between discretionary and obligatory intergenerational interaction.
BACKGROUNDMost family scholars acknowledge that families live near each other, assist each other, stay in contact, and care about each other (Streib and Beck, 1980;Troll et al., 1979). Intergenerational work has focused primarily on geographical distance, frequency of contact, and the exchange of goods and services. The emotional components of intergenerational bonds have been neglected. The relationships among distance, aid, contact, and intimacy have been slighted also. The connections between intimacy and intergenerational aid and contact are assumed, but rarely tested, by family researchers. Using data from three generations of women, our purpose in this paper is to examine the association of intimacy to aid and contact in two sets of mother-daughter relationships.
Previous ResearchSome researchers incorporate emotional gratification and support into the concept of aid exchange (Hill, 1970). Similarly, one sometimes finds frequency of contact (Lee, 1980) or aid (Lee and Ellithorpe, 1982) as indicators of relationship quality, implying...