2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Physical Activity Behavior in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Current evidence supports the efficacy of PA intervention on subjective but not objective outcomes. However, conclusions from this review should be interpreted with caution because of the small number of studies included and small sample size. Further, while using theory in intervention design, interventions in this review have not reported the refining of theory. Exploration of the use of additional BCTs to change PA behavior is also required within future interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of such interventions appears to be related to the combination of the delivery of evidence from experts and practical interventions tailored to personalised goals [13,16]. Moreover, focus groups have revealed pwMS want a variety of information from a variety of sources and that this information should be both stratified, interactive, and provided by subject experts to aid in the uptake of positive lifestyle behaviours [37][38][39]. The workshops meet these criteria and where possible utilised medically trained facilitators who themselves had been diagnosed with MS, providing expert knowledge as well as personal experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of such interventions appears to be related to the combination of the delivery of evidence from experts and practical interventions tailored to personalised goals [13,16]. Moreover, focus groups have revealed pwMS want a variety of information from a variety of sources and that this information should be both stratified, interactive, and provided by subject experts to aid in the uptake of positive lifestyle behaviours [37][38][39]. The workshops meet these criteria and where possible utilised medically trained facilitators who themselves had been diagnosed with MS, providing expert knowledge as well as personal experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and problem solving, which combined can enhance intervention implementation. 12 The inconsistent use of PA behavioral interventions by HCP in routine care is an important contributor to the low levels of PA observed among PwMS. 9 Having explored HCP needs in an American context, Learmonth et al 14 propose the lack of PA behavioral consultation might be explained by the unmet needs of HCPs.…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 A current theme in the literature is that initiatives to increase engagement in PA with neurologic populations should also include behavior change strategies (BCS). 12 BCS are the active components of a behavior change intervention. 13 A behavior change intervention is a coordinated set of strategies designed to target a specific behavioral pattern, such as PA. 13 BCS are ways to ensure optimal effectiveness of healthy lifestyle promotion and include components such as assessing self-efficacy, barrier identification…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provides a theory driven approach to designing and evaluating behavioural interventions that is derived from the synthesis of 83 theories of behaviour and behaviour change. 47 One means of improving the systematic development and evaluation of self-care interventions for patients with HF would be to report on the use of theory in the design of interventions, whether and how the intervention tests theory, and how findings inform theory development 45,53 together with taxonomic evaluations of behaviour, the application of the TDF and related approaches can be used to systematically advance understanding of behavioural change agents.…”
Section: Change Agents In Self-care Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%