2016
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1167362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing social attitudes toward disability: perspectives from historical, cultural, and educational studies

Abstract: Changing Social Attitudes toward Disability is a fascinating edited volume with contributions from 15 authors, each presenting a well-written and thought-provoking insight into their academic world. The book's greatest strength is giving an academic reader an opportunity to gain flashes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In so doing, power relations are playing out; the political backdrop and legislative landscape are elitist, based upon higher levels of literacy by ‘some’ (p. 224). Equally, Bolt (2014) suggests the notion of ‘disabled’ delineates between able and disabled, creating supremacy ideologies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In so doing, power relations are playing out; the political backdrop and legislative landscape are elitist, based upon higher levels of literacy by ‘some’ (p. 224). Equally, Bolt (2014) suggests the notion of ‘disabled’ delineates between able and disabled, creating supremacy ideologies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although disability studies investigates disability as a socially constructed phenomenon, the literature shows that manifestations of how the disability experience affects the adult learning context are frequently ignored (Clark, 2006). Accordingly, many variants of ableism find their way into the classroom: cognitive ableism is a bias in favour of the interests of people who actually or potentially have certain cognitive abilities (Carlson, 2001); lexism is an array of normative practices, assumptions, and attitudes about literacy (Collinson, 2014); sanism is the privileging of people who do not have socalled mental health problems (Prendergast, 2014); audism is the normative landscape in which everyone perceives by auditory means (Bauman and Murray, 2009); and ocularcentrism is the dominance of visual perception (Jay, 1994). The list could go on and on, for normative positivisms are embedded in every aspect of Higher Education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%