Oral anticoagulation challenges and dilemmas in the very elderly 1 end, joint approaches from international working groups aimed to practically guide the anticoagulation decisions based on the existing observational data and despite the absence of an established threshold to define "elderly" and "very elderly." 4 Nevertheless, current evidence mostly concerns elderly populations (65-79 years of age), while very elderly populations (≥ 80 years of age) have been under -represented. 2 Given the rapid aging of the global population and great heterogeneity of the very elderly population, the current review aims at gathering and critically appraising the existing literature on the anticoagulation -related outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians with cardiovascular disease in need of OAC.Aging and organ function An ancient Greek saying warns "Fear old age, for it never comes alone."Introduction The positive correlation of age with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including bleeding and thromboembolism, has been long established. 1 The aging -induced organ dysfunction, along with the usually occurring multimorbidity and polypharmacy, create a critical conundrum over whether the anticoagulation benefits outweigh the bleeding risks. In real -world clinical practice, oral anticoagulation (OAC) drugs are usually suboptimally prescribed in elderly and very elderly patients in need of anticoagulation due to the fear of bleeding and the lack of specific randomized trials and guidelines. 2 The risk factors for ischemic and bleeding events often coexist, and bleeding episodes seem to account for higher mortality rates. 3 Hence, the development of individualized recommendations is particularly important in this setting. To that