2017
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2017.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Tradition in the Humanitarian Sector: The Business Model Approach of the Kenya Red Cross

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Funding for complex humanitarian contexts is built on traditional business models, which emerged from the need for an increased accountability of humanitarian organisations over thirty years ago following much needed critique of the incalculable suffering and losses from humanitarian crisis at the time. Although there have been some important in-roads made in expediating humanitarian assistance and firming up important logistical arrangements in very complex settings ( Zolnikov and Zolnikov, 2018 ), the model’s original aims to ease global suffering and to continue to respond to consistently elevated humanitarian needs have been thwarted by the enormous growth in some UN humanitarian agencies over others, and by those organisations that are the most effective in promoting their mandates. This might be more defensible if the mandates were shared across all UN agencies but instead, they are inconsistent, promulgating fragmented assistance, weak co-ordination and exclusion of local populations from meaningful involvement in decision making.…”
Section: Exploring Contemporary Complex Humanitarian Crisis Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funding for complex humanitarian contexts is built on traditional business models, which emerged from the need for an increased accountability of humanitarian organisations over thirty years ago following much needed critique of the incalculable suffering and losses from humanitarian crisis at the time. Although there have been some important in-roads made in expediating humanitarian assistance and firming up important logistical arrangements in very complex settings ( Zolnikov and Zolnikov, 2018 ), the model’s original aims to ease global suffering and to continue to respond to consistently elevated humanitarian needs have been thwarted by the enormous growth in some UN humanitarian agencies over others, and by those organisations that are the most effective in promoting their mandates. This might be more defensible if the mandates were shared across all UN agencies but instead, they are inconsistent, promulgating fragmented assistance, weak co-ordination and exclusion of local populations from meaningful involvement in decision making.…”
Section: Exploring Contemporary Complex Humanitarian Crisis Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%