Over the past few years, ARM has been the dominant player in embedded systems and System-on-Chips (SoCs). However, with the emergence of hardware platforms based on the RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture (ISA), it has become necessary to compare these two ISAs. In this study, our goal is to comprehensively evaluate the energy efficiency and performance of ARM and RISC-V ISAs across three different SoCs. We will conduct benchmark tests to measure power consumption and overall system performance. The results of our study are valuable to developers and researchers looking to select the best ISA for energy-efficient computing applications. Our findings indicate that while RISC-V hardware platforms exhibit lower average power consumption than their ARM counterparts, the performance-per-watt ratio may not necessarily favor RISC-V. Ultimately, our overarching objective is to thoroughly examine both ISAs and to pinpoint areas where each can be enhanced, ultimately contributing to greater energy efficiency. Furthermore, to ensure the practical applicability of our findings, we will use the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software OpenFOAM. This step serves to validate the relevance of our results in real-world scenarios. It allows us to fine-tune execution parameters based on the insights gained from our initial study. By doing so, we aim not only to provide meaningful conclusions, but also to investigate the transferability of our results to practical applications. Our analysis will also scrutinize the capabilities of these SoCs when handling nonsynthetic software workloads, thereby broadening the scope of our evaluation.