2018
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Words and Sounds: The Roles of Different Cognitive Units in Sound Change

Abstract: This study considers the role of different cognitive units in sound change: phonemes, contextual variants and words. We examine /u/-fronting and /j/-dropping in data from three generations of Derby English speakers. We analyze dynamic formant data and auditory judgments, using mixed effects regression methods, including generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs). /u/-fronting is reaching its end-point, showing complex conditioning by context and a frequency effect that weakens over time. /j/-dropping is declini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diachronic development of context-driven statistical sub-distributions can override the original causal link (Sóskuthy 2013). Under this scenario, it is not possible to discern which of the competing predictors is diachronically responsible for the relation, and either or both the compensatory mechanism and the laryngeal features could have had a role in generating the synchronic patterns (this kind of reasoning is compatible for example with exemplar theories of speech perception and production, see among others Johnson 1997;Ambridge 2018;Sóskuthy et al 2018;Todd et al 2019).…”
Section: Compensatory Temporal Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diachronic development of context-driven statistical sub-distributions can override the original causal link (Sóskuthy 2013). Under this scenario, it is not possible to discern which of the competing predictors is diachronically responsible for the relation, and either or both the compensatory mechanism and the laryngeal features could have had a role in generating the synchronic patterns (this kind of reasoning is compatible for example with exemplar theories of speech perception and production, see among others Johnson 1997;Ambridge 2018;Sóskuthy et al 2018;Todd et al 2019).…”
Section: Compensatory Temporal Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through synthesizing a range of work, Hay () argues in this volume that the cognitive representations of sounds and words are linked with one another, and that their representations and subsequent processing of those representations are affected by experience with the sounds in the contexts in which they frequently appear. Results from two further papers in this issue lend further support to Hay's arguments: Sóskuthy, Foulkes, Hughes, and Haddican () demonstrate that the realization of one phonetic variable is linked with the word it occurs in and whether a second phonetic variable can be found in that word. Likewise, Kim and Drager () provide new evidence confirming that lexical access is assisted by socioindexical cues in the speech signal.…”
Section: What Can Sociolinguistics and Cognitive Science Bring To Eacmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Second, interactions create multiple opportunities for significance testing, and, in many cases, all possible outcomes may be theoretically interesting, which increases the rate of false positives. Therefore, we take a conservative approach to evaluating predictors that are involved in interactions (see Sóskuthy, Foulkes, Hughes, & Haddican [2018] for a similar approach). Instead of relying on model summaries, we employ model comparisons based on log-likelihood tests: we first fit a nested model that excludes all terms that involve the relevant predictor and then compare this nested model to the full model.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%