2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2018.8647962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Code Analysis and Design Using Multiple Variable-Length Codes in Parallel without Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant to our techniques is the work in [17] where (single-layer) LDPC codes are used for a BEC with an erasure rate that can take one of two values: full decoding is sought for the better channel, while for the worse channel some partial correction performance is specified. More related work includes non-asymptotic design of bilayer LDPC codes such as codes that enable decoder parallelism [13] and codes for incremental redundancy [14], [15], [16] (whose layer 2 is an LDGM code). Another indication of interest in bilayer/multi-layer codes is a parallel work on (non-LDPC) algebraic bilayer/multi-layer codes [18], [19], [20], [21].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relevant to our techniques is the work in [17] where (single-layer) LDPC codes are used for a BEC with an erasure rate that can take one of two values: full decoding is sought for the better channel, while for the worse channel some partial correction performance is specified. More related work includes non-asymptotic design of bilayer LDPC codes such as codes that enable decoder parallelism [13] and codes for incremental redundancy [14], [15], [16] (whose layer 2 is an LDGM code). Another indication of interest in bilayer/multi-layer codes is a parallel work on (non-LDPC) algebraic bilayer/multi-layer codes [18], [19], [20], [21].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: See Appendix C. Remark 3: Although the right-hand side of (15) and the first argument in the min operator of ( 16) only have the variable y in them and thus may appear to only depend on layer 2, in fact their values depend on both layers through the function q(•). Moreover, it is not clear, apriori, which argument of the min operator of ( 16) will be smaller, and one must use the above procedure to calculate the values.…”
Section: Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation