2021
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1882008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel dynamics and geomorphological adjustments of Kaljani River in Himalayan foothills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This migration is also significantly influenced by geomorphology, which presents difficulties for riverbank protection structures. Existing structures may be destroyed or avoided as a river meander and changes its course, rendering them useless (Hasanuzzaman et al, 2022). It is crucial to take channel migration into account during the design process and create safety protocols that take longterm changes in the river course into account.…”
Section: Research Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This migration is also significantly influenced by geomorphology, which presents difficulties for riverbank protection structures. Existing structures may be destroyed or avoided as a river meander and changes its course, rendering them useless (Hasanuzzaman et al, 2022). It is crucial to take channel migration into account during the design process and create safety protocols that take longterm changes in the river course into account.…”
Section: Research Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous studies investigating the evolution of morphology in river systems that are disrupted by natural and artificial factors such as dam construction, channel modifications, land use changes, volcanic eruptions, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. To adequately describe and predict the geomorphic responses in a fluvial system, four components of channel change should be considered: direction, magnitude, time rate, and spatial extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many water resources experts, engineers, and policymakers rely on a thorough grasp of the historical planform evolution in rivers over time to carry out river management operations (Roy and Sinha, 2018; Majumdar and Mandal, 2020). Tremendous endeavors have been undertaken to investigate channel planform behaviour locally and worldwide over the last three decades (Bora and Goswami, 2021; Hasanuzzaman et al 2021). Numerous geospatial technology-based studies have been conducted across the world, including in the United States on the four rivers of Olympic National park (East et al, 2017) , Taiwan on the Zhuoshui River and the Gaoping River (Kuo et al, 2017), Italy on the Scrivia river (Mandarino et al, 2020), Germany on the Old Rhine downstream (Arnaud et al, 2015), China on the lower yellow river (Kong et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2021) and the lower jingjiang reach (Yang et al, 2013), India on the Koshi river (Sinha et al, 2014), the Sharda river (Midha and Mathur, 2014), the Dwarkeswar river (Ghosh and Mukhopadhyay, 2021), the middle lower part of ganga , and the Ramganga river basin (Agnihotri et al, 2020), and Bangladesh on the lower padma river (Rashid, 2020; Nawfee et al, 2018;Halder et al, 2021), the rivers in southern estuarine Region (Islam et al, 2018), the Lower Meghna river (Mahmud et al, 2020), Madhumati river (Biswas et al, 2021), the lower Teesta river (Akhter et al, 2019), and the Brahmaputra river (Rashid et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%