2017
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02158-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel-Inactivating Mutations and Their Revertant Mutants in the Envelope Protein of Infectious Bronchitis Virus

Abstract: It has been shown previously in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) that two point mutations, N15A and V25F, in the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the envelope (E) protein abolished channel activity and led to in vivo attenuation. Pathogenicity was recovered in mutants that also regained E protein channel activity. In particular, V25F was rapidly compensated by changes at multiple V25F-facing TMD residues located on a neighboring monomer, consistent with a recovery of oligomerization. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that while some of these mutations appear to merely restore the loss of ion channel activity, it is not entirely inconceivable that revertant viruses would acquire gain of function mutations that can render it more virulent [77]. Similar results were recently reported for IBV E TMD residues analogous to N15A and V25F (T16A and A26F) [222]. It is interesting to note that in both cases SARS-CoV E and IBV E followed a similar trend in their reversion: mutations at N15A and T16A both reverted by substitution of a single residue, whereas mutations at V25F and A26F produced revertants by acquisition of multiple residues.…”
Section: Release: Viroporinsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This suggests that while some of these mutations appear to merely restore the loss of ion channel activity, it is not entirely inconceivable that revertant viruses would acquire gain of function mutations that can render it more virulent [77]. Similar results were recently reported for IBV E TMD residues analogous to N15A and V25F (T16A and A26F) [222]. It is interesting to note that in both cases SARS-CoV E and IBV E followed a similar trend in their reversion: mutations at N15A and T16A both reverted by substitution of a single residue, whereas mutations at V25F and A26F produced revertants by acquisition of multiple residues.…”
Section: Release: Viroporinsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…CoV E protein is a small structural protein that serves critical functions in the morphogenesis and release of mature virions (DeDiego et al, 2007;To et al, 2017), and its recently characterized IC activity has been implicated in modulating viral pathogenesis . In this study, we have constructed five rIBVs: the parental rIBV-p65, two rIBVs harboring IC-inactivating mutations in the E protein (rT16A and rA26F), and two putative revertants harboring one additional mutation in the TMD of E protein (rT16A/A26V and rA26F/F14N, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into the envelope and provides structural support to the virion. The E protein is a small, integral membrane protein present at a low amount in the virion, but it plays an essential role during virion assembly and release [11,12]. Inside the envelope, the helically symmetric nucleocapsid is comprised of the RNA genome closely associated with the N protein in a beads-on-a-string fashion.…”
Section: Review Fung and Liumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current evidence suggests E protein as a type I transmembrane protein with a short N-terminal ectodomain and a C-terminal endodomain ( Figure 3A), but alternative membrane topologies have also been proposed [79,80]. Biophysical studies show that some coronavirus E proteins can form pentameric structures exhibiting ion channel activity [12,81]. The E protein is reported to be modified by glycosylation and palmitoylation ( Figure 3B & Table 1) [80,82].…”
Section: Palmitoylationmentioning
confidence: 99%