2023
DOI: 10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3233372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel-Resilient Deep-Learning-Driven Device Fingerprinting Through Multiple Data Streams

Abstract: Enabling accurate and automated identification of wireless devices is critical for allowing network access monitoring and ensuring data authentication for large-scale IoT networks. RF fingerprinting has emerged as a solution for device identification by leveraging the transmitters' inevitable hardware impairments that occur during manufacturing. Although deep learning is proven efficient in classifying devices based on hardware impairments, the performance of deep learning models suffers greatly from variation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [129], the authors present a DL-based device fingerprinting approach that leverages Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) system capabilities and Space-Time Block Codes (STBCs) to mitigate the adverse effects AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels have on SEI performance. Since SEI features are distorted by Rayleigh fading channels, the approach in [129] exploits the MIMO system's multiple received signal streams to reconstruct a less-distorted version of transmitted signals, which are later used for model training and classification. Without knowledge of the channel state information, the transmitted signal is estimated at the receiver using two blind-source-separation and blind-channel-estimation algorithms, neither relying on pilot symbol-based estimation.…”
Section: Operating Channel Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [129], the authors present a DL-based device fingerprinting approach that leverages Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) system capabilities and Space-Time Block Codes (STBCs) to mitigate the adverse effects AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels have on SEI performance. Since SEI features are distorted by Rayleigh fading channels, the approach in [129] exploits the MIMO system's multiple received signal streams to reconstruct a less-distorted version of transmitted signals, which are later used for model training and classification. Without knowledge of the channel state information, the transmitted signal is estimated at the receiver using two blind-source-separation and blind-channel-estimation algorithms, neither relying on pilot symbol-based estimation.…”
Section: Operating Channel Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented approach's SEI performance is evaluated by adjusting the emitters' phase noise, CFO, and IQ gain imbalance hardware impairments within a fixed range. This allows the authors of [129] to simulate up to ten emitters with three antennas and Wi-Fi communication. The approach performs emitter identification via a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and signals that undergo varying Average Path Gain (APG) and Doppler shift changes.…”
Section: Operating Channel Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, due to the intrinsic nature of wireless channels, it is challenging and impractical to devise a universal channel-augmenting model capable of significantly improving performance across a wide range of wireless channels. Other data-centric approaches mitigate the impact of the channel through channel equalization [12], [13], [14] or impairment compensation [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is widely believed that the wireless channel, influenced by various confounding factors, plays a significant role in the failure of these approaches to adapt and generalize to different domains. To address the impact of the channel and enhance domain generalization, some studies have focused on removing channel dynamics from the raw signal through techniques like channel equalization [12], [13], [14], [15] or hardware impairment compensation [6]. However, these approaches have drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%