2021
DOI: 10.1002/esp.5083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel response to a dam‐removal sediment pulse captured at high‐temporal resolution using routine gage data

Abstract: In this study, we captured how a river channel responds to a sediment pulse originating from a dam removal using multiple lines of evidence derived from streamflow gages along the Patapsco River, Maryland, USA. Gages captured characteristics of the sediment pulse, including travel times of its leading edge ($7.8 km yr −1 ) and peak ($2.6 km yr −1 ) and suggest both translation and increasing dispersion. The pulse also changed local hydraulics and energy conditions, increasing flow velocities and Froude number,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the downstream two sites are improving, rather than showing natural variability, it reflects the exhumation of spawning gravel through attenuation of the downstream terminus of the sediment pulse. This behavior is also not typical of previously-described post-dam sediment pulses (Cashman et al, 2021). We acknowledge the difficulty in interpreting complex bed dynamics using single annual measurements at widely-spaced, fixed locations on the river.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…If the downstream two sites are improving, rather than showing natural variability, it reflects the exhumation of spawning gravel through attenuation of the downstream terminus of the sediment pulse. This behavior is also not typical of previously-described post-dam sediment pulses (Cashman et al, 2021). We acknowledge the difficulty in interpreting complex bed dynamics using single annual measurements at widely-spaced, fixed locations on the river.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…These are the sediment-pulse volumes typically encountered by river managers. In the past few years, more data sets of larger sediment inputs, primarily from larger dam removals (Cashman et al, 2021;East et al, 2015East et al, , 2018Harrison et al, 2018;Major et al, 2012;Pace et al, 2017;Ritchie et al, 2018;Warrick et al, 2015) and modeling studies using these data sets (Cui et al, 2014(Cui et al, , 2019De Rego et al, 2020) have appeared in the literature. In the future, more directly testing an updated model against these data sets would provide a robust validation of large sediment-pulse movement in rivers.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Channel incision may occur instead of aggradation when pulse volume is relatively small and pulse grain size is finer than bed • Intermediate grain size pulses have the largest downstream effects; finer sizes translate quickly and coarser sizes disperse slowly • A mixed-distribution pulse with smaller median grain size than the bed increases bed mobility more than a uniform-distribution pulse (Benda et al, 2004;Moody & Martin, 2004;Murphy et al, 2018Murphy et al, , 2019Sankey et al, 2017). Anthropogenic perturbations can also alter the frequency and magnitude of sediment supply, such as through dam removal (Cashman et al, 2021;Czuba et al, 2011;Dow et al, 2020;East et al, 2015East et al, , 2018Major et al, 2012;Ritchie et al, 2018) and gravel augmentation (Arnaud et al, 2017;Gaeuman et al, 2017;Welber et al, 2020). Once delivered into a river, a pulse of sediment moves downstream through some combination of translation, dispersion, and attrition of particles (An et al, 2017;Cashman et al, 2021;Cui & Parker, 2005;East et al, 2015East et al, , 2018Lisle, 2008;Lisle et al, 1997Lisle et al, , 2001Major et al, 2012;Ritchie et al, 2018;Sklar et al, 2009;Sutherland et al, 2002) or can be stored within the river and floodplain network (Benda & Dunne, 1997a;Cashman et al, 2021;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations