2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel responses to varying sediment input: A flume experiment modeled after Redwood Creek, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
87
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the view that the immediate controls of this fl ux (unlike the washload fl ux, which is supply-limited) are fl ow strength and bed surface grain size distribution (Wilcock, 2001). The sediment supply from upstream is relevant only indirectly via its effect on surface size distribution: reduced supply induces surface coarsening which reduces transport rates, and increased supply does the opposite, as demonstrated experimentally or numerically by Dietrich et al (1989), Hoey and Ferguson (1997), and Madej et al (2009) among others. A consequence of our assumption of supply at capacity is that there is no change in bed elevation or composition at the head of the reach, but the gradient is free to alter.…”
Section: Morphodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the view that the immediate controls of this fl ux (unlike the washload fl ux, which is supply-limited) are fl ow strength and bed surface grain size distribution (Wilcock, 2001). The sediment supply from upstream is relevant only indirectly via its effect on surface size distribution: reduced supply induces surface coarsening which reduces transport rates, and increased supply does the opposite, as demonstrated experimentally or numerically by Dietrich et al (1989), Hoey and Ferguson (1997), and Madej et al (2009) among others. A consequence of our assumption of supply at capacity is that there is no change in bed elevation or composition at the head of the reach, but the gradient is free to alter.…”
Section: Morphodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rivers with very high sediment supply are often braided (2), and aggradation occurs when the sediment supply to a channel is in excess of the channel's capacity to transport that sediment (14). Additionally, the bed surface can armor through size selective transport in low supply conditions (1, 3), or the bed surface grain size can fine in response to high sediment supply (15). Despite the prevalence of these observations, we lack a coherent understanding of how these responses are expressed in τ p bf , which is a function of both grain size and channel geometry.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, both continent-wide trends and paired sites suggest that rivers in high erosion rate landscapes, where sediment supplies are high, have adjusted to maintain high bankfull Shields stresses rather than maintaining threshold conditions at bankfull flow. 15). Although it is difficult to observe armoring of channels during high-flow conditions, the armor ratio of the channel measured at low flow appears to provide an index of the sediment supply and transport conditions during the formative flows (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widening and sedimentation associated with these events often result in channel expansion and simplification [e.g., Meyer, 2001]. The transport capacity of the enlarged channel would thus be reduced under more typical flow conditions, and a series of hydraulic and morphologic adjustments would ensue so as to achieve a new balance between sediment supply and transport capacity [e.g., Madej, 2001;Madej et al, 2009]. An analogous sequence of changes might be expected to occur as a river that has been simplified during restoration gradually develops more complex, natural topography featuring bar forms of higher amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%