2015 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/sips.2015.7345018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel shortening and equalization based on information rate maximization for evolved GSM/EDGE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the HOM shortener is a static and heuristic approach, it neither takes the noise power nor the quality of feedbackx into account when designing w hom . Consequently, the detection performance is often inferior to the UBM shortener [20]. Moreover, the UBM shortener also suffers from performance losses in middle and high SNR regimes.…”
Section: The Optimal Fom Channel Shortener Design For Rs-sovementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the HOM shortener is a static and heuristic approach, it neither takes the noise power nor the quality of feedbackx into account when designing w hom . Consequently, the detection performance is often inferior to the UBM shortener [20]. Moreover, the UBM shortener also suffers from performance losses in middle and high SNR regimes.…”
Section: The Optimal Fom Channel Shortener Design For Rs-sovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we elaborate the optimal FOM shortener design. Although we adopt the same approach as MILB-maximization, the FOM shortener is different from the previous designs [15], [20], which are based on Ungerbeock model and take no feedback into consideration. In [29], the authors extend the UBM shortener to deal with soft feedback and with turbo iterations.…”
Section: The Optimal Fom Channel Shortener Design For Rs-sovementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown in [13] that, computing the channel shortening prefilter coefficients in the MILB demodulator requires half the complexity as in the HOM demodulator. With diversity branches, the savings can also be achieved with Algorithm-1.…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With diversity branches, the savings can also be achieved with Algorithm-1. This is because that, the inversion of covariance matrix R is required in both demodulators 2 , and step 2 and 7 in Algorithm-1 require a low amount of scalar multiplications and inversions compared to the case with a single diversity branch in [13].…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%