1994
DOI: 10.1016/0254-0584(94)90001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channeling implants in silicon crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Ion implantation is the most widely used technique for forming shallow junctions. However, as the device geometries keep shrinking, it has become more and more difficult to obtain the junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Ion implantation is the most widely used technique for forming shallow junctions. However, as the device geometries keep shrinking, it has become more and more difficult to obtain the junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to non-invasively image a pronounced diffusion of the phosphor ions along crystal directions which we attribute to axial channeling effects. This diffusive channeling is distinct from ion implantation channeling, [23][24][25] since it occurs after thermal annealing and, in particular, perpendicular to the implantation direction. The copper implantation field at the right side is hardly visible because of the fast copper diffusion during the annealing step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the figure it is also shown the TRIM simulation of the C concentration profile due to the implant. The profile is shown up to a depth of about 0.8 m, since at larger depths the shape of the profile is dominated by the channeling effect 20 which is not considered in the TRIM simulation. It is very important to note that in the surface region ͑up to a depth of 0.8 m͒ the TRIM profile is in good agreement with SIMS measurements performed on samples which were subjected to the same C implant and subsequent thermal process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%