2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nahs.2007.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos control in AFM systems using nonlinear delayed feedback via sliding mode control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among others, Zou et al [11] presented and experimentally applied an inversion-based feedback/feedforward control approach; Merry et al [12] applied a feedback control to all of 3 d.o.f. of a metrological AFM; Arjmand et al [13] used a non-linear delayed feedback control to control chaos in AFMs, as well as Yamasue and Hikihara [14] and Salarieh and Alasty [15]; a feedback control composed of a sliding mode control (SMC) and a backstepping feedback was proposed by Wang et al [16] to control chaotic motions in a spring-mass model of AFM; Nozaki et al [17] applied the State Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) together with time-delayed feedback control to a tapping-mode AFM model. Furthermore, Yagasaki [18] has recently applied the external feedback control technique proposed by Pyragas to a simple tapping AFM model, which works by keeping the cantilever vibration to a selected reference one and allows us to simultaneously measure the sample surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Zou et al [11] presented and experimentally applied an inversion-based feedback/feedforward control approach; Merry et al [12] applied a feedback control to all of 3 d.o.f. of a metrological AFM; Arjmand et al [13] used a non-linear delayed feedback control to control chaos in AFMs, as well as Yamasue and Hikihara [14] and Salarieh and Alasty [15]; a feedback control composed of a sliding mode control (SMC) and a backstepping feedback was proposed by Wang et al [16] to control chaotic motions in a spring-mass model of AFM; Nozaki et al [17] applied the State Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) together with time-delayed feedback control to a tapping-mode AFM model. Furthermore, Yagasaki [18] has recently applied the external feedback control technique proposed by Pyragas to a simple tapping AFM model, which works by keeping the cantilever vibration to a selected reference one and allows us to simultaneously measure the sample surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the chaos behavior in some engineering system is highly unexpected because it will influence performance of system. In recent years, growing interests from physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering have stimulated the studies of chaos control techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Several control methods leading to suppression of chaos have been presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many active control methods have been presented for control of chaotic systems such as nonlinear feedback control [12], drive-response synchronization method [13], adaptive control method [14,15], variable structure (or sliding mode) control method [16][17][18][19], back stepping control method [20,21], fractional control [22], impulsive control [23], and adaptive sliding mode control [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%