1991
DOI: 10.1145/115953.115974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos router

Abstract: The Chaos router is an adaptive, randomized message router for multlicomputers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamically allocated buffer structured was proposed in [11]. DAMQ with self compacting buffers [12], FCCB [13], VC allocation on traffic condition [14], Chaos router [15], BLAM routing algorithm [16], Geyser 1 [17] are also discussed in literature. Some power aware models are discussed in [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamically allocated buffer structured was proposed in [11]. DAMQ with self compacting buffers [12], FCCB [13], VC allocation on traffic condition [14], Chaos router [15], BLAM routing algorithm [16], Geyser 1 [17] are also discussed in literature. Some power aware models are discussed in [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third component, in addition to switching and flow control, that has a significant impact on network performance is the routing algorithm. Several research studies have shown performance benefits of various adaptive routing schemes compared to oblivious routing [15,14,9,17,7,2,5]. Theoretically, it is known that routing adaptivity is a desirable feature since it can lower average message latency at moderate to high load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-synchronous routers use the same principle of deflection routing but relax the constraint of synchronous operation by adding buffers that can hold incoming packets while waiting for output channels to become free [22,17]. Such routers need additional mechanisms like the packet exchange protocol [22] to prevent deadlocks.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livelock can never occur in minimal adaptive routing, as packets always reach their destination within a finite number of hops because every hop takes a packet closer to its destination. In contrast, non-minimal adaptive routing, such as the Chaos routing algorithm [17], is not provably livelockfree, because it allows packets to be "misrouted" outside the minimal rectangle at every hop. That is, it allows hops that takes a packet farther from its destination and, hence, does not guarantee delivery within a finite number of hops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%