2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010jpo4400.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaotic Behaviors in the Response of a Quasigeostrophic Oceanic Double Gyre to Seasonal External Forcing

Abstract: In an oceanic double-gyre system, nonlinear oscillations of the ocean under seasonally changing external forcing are investigated using a 1.5-layer quasigeostrophic model and a simple model related to energy balance of the oceanic double gyre. In the experiments, the variable parameter is the amplitude of external seasonal forcing and the Reynolds number is fixed as 39, at which periodic shedding of inertial subgyres occurs. The authors found that entrainment (at 2 times the period of the forcing) and intermit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution equilibrated to a stable period orbit with a period of 8 months. Shimokawa and Matsuura (2010) similarly showed with a time-dependent forcing but a quasi-geostrophic model that at least two different regimes were possible. Here, no parameters are modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This solution equilibrated to a stable period orbit with a period of 8 months. Shimokawa and Matsuura (2010) similarly showed with a time-dependent forcing but a quasi-geostrophic model that at least two different regimes were possible. Here, no parameters are modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Usually, the forcing fields are stationary in these approaches. To our knowledge, the influence of a time-varying forcing has only been investigated by Shimokawa and Matsuura (2010). Using a 1.5-layer quasi-geostrophic model, they showed that synchronization appeared between an intrinsic frequency of the system and half the frequency of the forcing; on the other hand, intermittency (irregular variations) emerged with an increasing amplitude of the forcing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%