2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaotic particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch considering the generator constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convergence curves make clear that the results converged from larger values guarantee that the proposed WEO algorithm is efficient and obtain better results than earlier reported techniques. [10] 1,051,163 NA NA 0.421 EP [10] 1,048,638 NA NA 15.049 HS [12] 1,046,726 NA NA NA DE [11] 1,036,756 1,040,586 1,452,558 0.20 GA [7] 1,033,481 1,038,014 1,042,606 NA SOA [15] 1,023,946 1,026,289 1,029,213 NA AIS [9] 1,021,980 1,023,156 1,024,973 25.346 ABC [13] 1,021,576 1,022,686 1,024,316 2.603 TLA [16] 1,019,925 1,020,411 1,021,118 0.049 ICA [14] 1,018,467 1,019,291 1,021,796 NA HDE [29] 1,031,077 NA NA NA IPSO [17] 1 …”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The convergence curves make clear that the results converged from larger values guarantee that the proposed WEO algorithm is efficient and obtain better results than earlier reported techniques. [10] 1,051,163 NA NA 0.421 EP [10] 1,048,638 NA NA 15.049 HS [12] 1,046,726 NA NA NA DE [11] 1,036,756 1,040,586 1,452,558 0.20 GA [7] 1,033,481 1,038,014 1,042,606 NA SOA [15] 1,023,946 1,026,289 1,029,213 NA AIS [9] 1,021,980 1,023,156 1,024,973 25.346 ABC [13] 1,021,576 1,022,686 1,024,316 2.603 TLA [16] 1,019,925 1,020,411 1,021,118 0.049 ICA [14] 1,018,467 1,019,291 1,021,796 NA HDE [29] 1,031,077 NA NA NA IPSO [17] 1 …”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this deficiency, turn to various heuristic techniques such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) [7], Simulated Annealing (SA) [8], Artificial Immune System (AIS) [9], Evolutionary Programming (EP) [10], Differential Evolution (DE) [11], Harmony Search (HS) [12], Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) [13], Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) [14], Seeker Optimization Algorithm (SOA) [15], Teaching Learning Algorithm (TLA) [16], Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO) [17], Chaotic Differential Evolution (IDE) [18], Modified Teaching Learning Algorithm (MTLA) [19], Self-Adaptive Modified Firefly Algorithm (SAMFO) [20], Improve Pattern Search (IPS) [21], Enhanced Cross Entropy (ECE) [25], Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization (APSO) [28], Enhanced Bee Swarm Optimization (EBSO) [35], Deterministic Guided Particle Swarm Optimization (DGPSO) [37]. The main drawback of these heuristic techniques gives the results but struck the local minima and lack of guarantee of convergence infinite time for large scale DED problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the various known untainted stochastic approaches such as the Genetic Algorithm [7] (GA), Differential Evolution Algorithm [8] (DEA), Particle Swam Optimization [9] (PSO), Artificial Immune System [10] (AIS), Artificial Bee Colony Optimization [11] (ABCO), Ant Colony Optimization [12] (ACO) and Bacterial Foraging Optimization [13] (BFO) have been successfully employed to solve the PDED. However, these heuristic methods suffer in exploring the nearer optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA has an advantage of using a chromosome coding technique concerned to the defined problem and the two basic disadvantages are very long execution time and the global optimum solution has no guarantee of convergence. Nonconvex problems are solved also using PSO and many of its variants (Selvakumar, 2007;Thanushkodi, 2008;Gaing, 2003;Cai, 2007) There are many advantages of PSO such as easy performance and minimum adjustable parameters. It is also very efficient in global search (exploration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%