2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaotic sets of shift and weighted shift maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that some results of the Li-Yorke chaotic sets for the shift operator is already obtained by Fu et al in [2,3]. Our new contribution here is to characterize Li-Yorke chaotic sets by orbit invariants, Furstenberg families and p-scrambled points.…”
Section: Scrambled (Chaotic) Sets and Orbit Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that some results of the Li-Yorke chaotic sets for the shift operator is already obtained by Fu et al in [2,3]. Our new contribution here is to characterize Li-Yorke chaotic sets by orbit invariants, Furstenberg families and p-scrambled points.…”
Section: Scrambled (Chaotic) Sets and Orbit Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In [3], Fu and You thought that a possible route to solve Question 1.5 is to re-define the function η(·, ·). Theorem 2.3 shows that this works.…”
Section: Scrambled (Chaotic) Sets and Orbit Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then α is an orbit invariant on S, while S is not a scrambled set of f . However, in [12] it is shown that when we restrict our discussions to shift maps σ : Σ(N) → Σ(N), N ≥ 2, together with η(x, y) ≡ 1, x, y ∈ S, the existence of an orbit invariant on S is also a sufficient condition for S ⊆ Σ(N) to be a scrambled set of σ . Where η(·, ·) : S × S → [0, 1] is defined as:…”
Section: Scrambled Sets and Orbit Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%