2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00107-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 107 The Recognition Heuristic: A Fast and Frugal Way to Investment Choice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the recognition portfolio was most visible where ignorance was highest, that is, in international recognition, specifically for U.S. citizens' name recognition of German stocks. Further tests of the recognition heuristic in stock-picking contests led to comparable results (Ortmann et al 2008).…”
Section: Decision Making In Dynamic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The advantage of the recognition portfolio was most visible where ignorance was highest, that is, in international recognition, specifically for U.S. citizens' name recognition of German stocks. Further tests of the recognition heuristic in stock-picking contests led to comparable results (Ortmann et al 2008).…”
Section: Decision Making In Dynamic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In three studies on predicting the stock market, Ortmann et al (2008) reported that recognition-based portfolios (the set of most-recognized options), on average, outperformed managed funds such as the Fidelity Growth Fund, the market (Dow or Dax), chance portfolios, and stock experts. In contrast, Boyd (2001) found no such advantage when he used college students' recognition of stocks rather than that of the general public.…”
Section: Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When they obtained this information they created two portfolios: first, with the most recognized brands, and second, for control purposes, with 10 least recognizable ones. The first portfolio generated a profit of 2,5 %, and was a better result than 88 % of all contestants, while the second took a loss of 18,5 % which was as huge as loss of Capital's editor's-in-chief portfolio [25].…”
Section: Recognition Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 92%