2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0070-4571(08)10011-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 11 Bioturbation and Biogenic Sedimentary Structures in Contourites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High current velocity removes sediment and organic matter (Wetzel, Werner, & Stow, ) which could cause a high load of suspended material providing good feeding conditions for suspension feeders whereas deposit‐feeders dominate at lower flow velocities (Flach, Lavaleye, de Stiger, & Thomsen, ). Although high current velocities can also remove epifauna (Wetzel et al, ), areas dominated by suspension feeders can locally change flow velocities and cause resuspension and passive biodeposition of particles (Flach et al, ). Areas of high current velocities in our study were dominated by astrophorid sponges (Knudby, Kenchington, & Murillo, ) and the main deposit‐feeders found were ophiuroids that could be taking advantage of a passive biodeposition added to the detritus provided by the sponges (De Goeij et al, ; Witte, Brattegard, Graf, & Springer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High current velocity removes sediment and organic matter (Wetzel, Werner, & Stow, ) which could cause a high load of suspended material providing good feeding conditions for suspension feeders whereas deposit‐feeders dominate at lower flow velocities (Flach, Lavaleye, de Stiger, & Thomsen, ). Although high current velocities can also remove epifauna (Wetzel et al, ), areas dominated by suspension feeders can locally change flow velocities and cause resuspension and passive biodeposition of particles (Flach et al, ). Areas of high current velocities in our study were dominated by astrophorid sponges (Knudby, Kenchington, & Murillo, ) and the main deposit‐feeders found were ophiuroids that could be taking advantage of a passive biodeposition added to the detritus provided by the sponges (De Goeij et al, ; Witte, Brattegard, Graf, & Springer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetzel, 2008). Furthermore, the occurrence of Scolicia, traces left by irregular sea urchins, sometimes shows correspondence to coarsergrained intervals.…”
Section: Sedimentary Records Documenting Current Control Of Changing mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One important feature of contourite and associated deposits is bioturbation (e.g., Lovell and Stow, 1981;Chough and Hesse, 1985;Stow et al, 1998;Wetzel et al, 2008), although its preservation depends on the intensity of bottom currents (Tucholke et al, 1985;Gerino, 1990). As indicated by Wetzel et al (2008), ichnological information from deep-sea environments can help to characterize sandy and muddy contourite facies and distinguish them from associated turbidite and hemipelagite facies.…”
Section: Ichnological Information Contourites and Associated Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated by Wetzel et al (2008), ichnological information from deep-sea environments can help to characterize sandy and muddy contourite facies and distinguish them from associated turbidite and hemipelagite facies. Considering the narrow relationship between tracemakers and environmental conditions, ichnological analysis may prove useful to approach the genesis of contourite deposits, reflecting parameters such as current dynamics, rate of deposition, erosion, etc.…”
Section: Ichnological Information Contourites and Associated Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation