2016
DOI: 10.1075/lal.24.11han
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 11. ESL students’ perceptions of creative and academic writing

Abstract: This chapter provides a small scale, qualitative study of ESL students’ perceptions of positive and negative creative and academic writing experiences. Previous research has suggested that creative writing provides a more positive experience than academic writing and involves a different set of features. Nineteen ESL students were interviewed about their second language literacy instructional histories and focused on understandings of their experiences of writing. Interview data was coded for positive and nega… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing body of literature on writing poetry and teaching poetry writing does not consider multilingual students as part of the student groups and falls short of having empirical data to discuss further research inquiry or course design (see Nobles & Azano, 2016). Studies that do explore the teaching poetry writing empirically focus on writing poetry in a second language and have not investigated how monolingual students perceive writing poetry at university level (see Liao, 2016Liao, , 2017Liao, , 2018aLiao, , 2022Cahnmann-Taylor et al, 2015;Cahnmann-Taylor et al, 2017;Chamcharatsri, 2022;Disney, 2014;Hanauer, 2011Hanauer, , 2014Hanauer, , 2015Hanauer & Liao, 2016;Hauer & Hanauer, 2017;Iida, 2016aIida, , 2016bIida, , 2017Iida, , 2022Jeon & Ma, 2015;Liao & Roy, 2017;Masbuhin & Liao, 2017;Nobles & Azano, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing body of literature on writing poetry and teaching poetry writing does not consider multilingual students as part of the student groups and falls short of having empirical data to discuss further research inquiry or course design (see Nobles & Azano, 2016). Studies that do explore the teaching poetry writing empirically focus on writing poetry in a second language and have not investigated how monolingual students perceive writing poetry at university level (see Liao, 2016Liao, , 2017Liao, , 2018aLiao, , 2022Cahnmann-Taylor et al, 2015;Cahnmann-Taylor et al, 2017;Chamcharatsri, 2022;Disney, 2014;Hanauer, 2011Hanauer, , 2014Hanauer, , 2015Hanauer & Liao, 2016;Hauer & Hanauer, 2017;Iida, 2016aIida, , 2016bIida, , 2017Iida, , 2022Jeon & Ma, 2015;Liao & Roy, 2017;Masbuhin & Liao, 2017;Nobles & Azano, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%