2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-0056(00)80014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 11 The distribution of wealth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
197
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
8
197
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A more reasonable estimate of the wealth held for bequest purposes and recorded in the probate statistics is probably around £2000 billion. This is consistent with the estimates provided by Blinder (1988) and Davies and Shorrocks (1999) that bequests account for 35-45 per cent of total wealth. If one accepts the consumption and income profiles as correct, the only other behavioural explanation of the high level of wealth is that, in addition to the bequests which can be observed from probate statistics, people hold wealth in order to make transfers inter vivos 9 and those through mechanisms such as trusts on which probate is not required.…”
Section: Bequests and Transfers Inter Vivossupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A more reasonable estimate of the wealth held for bequest purposes and recorded in the probate statistics is probably around £2000 billion. This is consistent with the estimates provided by Blinder (1988) and Davies and Shorrocks (1999) that bequests account for 35-45 per cent of total wealth. If one accepts the consumption and income profiles as correct, the only other behavioural explanation of the high level of wealth is that, in addition to the bequests which can be observed from probate statistics, people hold wealth in order to make transfers inter vivos 9 and those through mechanisms such as trusts on which probate is not required.…”
Section: Bequests and Transfers Inter Vivossupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, at higher levels of development, high-income voters will be more willing to accept democracy, especially if the costs of repression are fixed. 9 Second, development has generally been correlated with lower levels of inequality, at least in the long run (Atkinson, Piketty, and Saez 2009;Davies and Shorrocks 2000;Morrisson 2000). As inequality declines, the redistributive demands of low-income voters fall and high-income voters are more likely to support democracy.…”
Section: Conditional Effects Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the Pareto distribution is used as it approximates well the top tail of income and wealth (Davies and Shorrocks, 2000). In addition, more complex functional forms might be used (Clauset et al, 2009;Burkhauser et al, 2012;Brzezinski, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%