1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-6142(08)62827-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 12 Fluid-driven Cyclic Propagation of a Joint in the Ithaca Siltstone, Appalachian Basin, New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the lateral propagation of joints in layered rocks has been demonstrated by field observations Lacazette & Engelder 1992) and in the laboratory (Wu & Pollard 1995). Figure 3 represents a typical joint geometry from a roadcut example of interbedded sandstone and shale from the Triassic of SE Utah, USA.…”
Section: Fracture Propagation In Layered Rocksmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of the lateral propagation of joints in layered rocks has been demonstrated by field observations Lacazette & Engelder 1992) and in the laboratory (Wu & Pollard 1995). Figure 3 represents a typical joint geometry from a roadcut example of interbedded sandstone and shale from the Triassic of SE Utah, USA.…”
Section: Fracture Propagation In Layered Rocksmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The clusters or fracture swarms essentially record the movement of a process zone across the rock body and, because of the higher stress intensity factor values, the propagation mechanism is no longer described by subcritical region I, but by region II, III or critical propagation (K I ՆK Ic ). However, even if fracture growth approaches critical conditions, high propagation velocities are not reached under typical or fluid-flow restrictions (Engelder & Lacazette 1990;Lacazette & Engelder 1992;Renshaw & Harvey 1994) reduce the stress intensity factor with propagation, resulting in a quasi-stable process. The apparent increase in cluster size with increased mechanical layer thickness inferred from the spacing data of Figure 11 suggests that thicker beds also allow for stronger mechanical crack interaction and more stress elevation in the crack-tip region, which may cause the growth of more fractures over a wider area in the 'process zone'.…”
Section: Process-zone Mechanics and Joint Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the layered siltstones and shales of the Appalachian Plateau, central New York, joint initiation points are almost always located at bedding interfaces at flaws such as fossils, pyrite concretions, voids, cusps and burrows along such surfaces [Bahat and Engelder, 1984;Lacazette and Engelder, 1992]. When a stack of siltstone layers is jointed, the joint initiation points are all located at the top of each layer, consistently where a joint approaching from above first intersects the next layer [Helgeson and Aydin, 1991].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for such incremental joint growth is provided by plumose structures often preserved on joint surfaces (e.g., Kulander et al, 1985;Bahat and Engelder, 1984;Lacazette and Engelder, 1992;Wu and Pollard, 1995). Each increment of growth is marked by an arrest line indicating the point of temporary cessation of joint growth (Fig.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Cross Joints In the Monterey Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4-9b) (Lacazette and Engelder, 1992) Theoretically, cross joints cannot propagate into a compressive zone (Dyer, 1988). Therefore, cross joint termination can be used as an indicator of the compressive zone boundary.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Cross Joints In the Monterey Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%