1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60578-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 12 Nucleosomes of Transcriptionally Active Chromatin: Isolation of Template-Active Nucleosomes by Affinity Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a mixture of active and inactive nucleosomes can be separated by entrapping the SH-reactive nucleosomes on a mercurated agarose support. The mercury-bound nucleosomes (and larger chromatin fragments containing the SH-reactive nucleosomes) are recovered by displacement with DTT (27,28). When mercury column chromatography was used to detect changes in nucleosome structure during oncogene activation, it was revealed that nucleosomes along an activated c-fos gene unfolded within minutes and reverted to the compact nonmercury-binding form within 15 min after transcription was suppressed (29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a mixture of active and inactive nucleosomes can be separated by entrapping the SH-reactive nucleosomes on a mercurated agarose support. The mercury-bound nucleosomes (and larger chromatin fragments containing the SH-reactive nucleosomes) are recovered by displacement with DTT (27,28). When mercury column chromatography was used to detect changes in nucleosome structure during oncogene activation, it was revealed that nucleosomes along an activated c-fos gene unfolded within minutes and reverted to the compact nonmercury-binding form within 15 min after transcription was suppressed (29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all experiments, to ensure a minimum amount of background replication, the cells were grown to confluence and treated with 2 mM hydroxyurea 45 min prior to UV damage. To allow comparison of data between experiments and between samples within one experiment, the "double-label" procedure described in Smerdon et al (17) Isolation of Nuclei and Chromatin Preparation-Nuclei were isolated as described (24) with the following modifications. Harvested cells were pelleted and resuspended in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1.0 mM CaCl 2 , 8.6% sucrose, and 5.0 mM sodium butyrate (to inhibit histone deacetylation).…”
Section: Candmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thiol-reactive chromatin released in fraction 3 represents only 1.8 Ϯ 0.4% of the soluble chromatin, or about 0.4% of total chromatin (see below). In the transcription studies on human 3T3 cells, Allfrey and co-workers (24,29) found that ϳ10% of the soluble chromatin was recovered in fraction 2 and ϳ7% in fraction 3. These differences from our results may reflect differences in solubility of the fragment sizes produced.…”
Section: Organomercurial Fractionation Of Normal Human Chromatin-normmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations