Chapter 13. Bosnias war crimes chamber and the challenges of an opening and closure

McDonald, Avril

doi:10.1163/ej.9789004163089.i-1122.95

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Creating the Bosnia Court1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Book3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, BWCC represents a de-internationalization of international justice, though as McDonald pointed out, "this ostensibly domestic court was created by outside agencies. (McDonald, 2009) The completion program of the ICTY meant that many cases that had been referred to the court would have to be dealt with somewhere else, presumably within the domestic courts that had been previously deemed deeply flawed. This meant that the international community and those involved in the ICTY would have to help reform the domestic courts of the Balkan states if they could serve as a site for adjudicating these cases.…”

Section: Creating the Bosnia Courtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Tribunals

Fichtelberg

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Creating the Bosnia Courtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Tribunals

Fichtelberg

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La responsabilité pénale des autorités politiques pour des crimes de droit international humanitair (DIH)

David

2013

Armed Conflict and International Law: In Search of the Human Face

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Substantive Law, Jurisdiction, Prosecution, and Courts

O’Keefe

2015

International Criminal Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The chapter first examines how, as a technical matter, states give effect in their respective bodies of municipal criminal law and criminal procedure to the substantive law of international crimes and to the jurisdiction over such crimes permitted or mandated by international law, and what international law may say about aspects of this. It then considers technical, principled, and pragmatic questions relating to, specifically, the prosecution of international crimes at the national level, focusing on controversy over the exercise of universal jurisdiction. It lastly surveys the types of criminal courts to which states entrust the municipal adjudication of international crimes, highlighting in the process a variety of special municipal criminal courts established by specific states.

show abstract

Chapter 13. Bosnias war crimes chamber and the challenges of an opening and closure

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Hybrid Tribunals

Hybrid Tribunals

La responsabilité pénale des autorités politiques pour des crimes de droit international humanitair (DIH)

Substantive Law, Jurisdiction, Prosecution, and Courts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About