2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1936-7961(08)00214-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 14 Demography of Central Yellowstone Bison: Effects of Climate, Density, and Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By our estimation, this would suggest that seropositive elk produce approximately 24% fewer calves than seronegative elk (see ). Similar reductions in pregnancy and recruitment attributable to brucellosis have been found for bison in Yellowstone, which lend additional support to our findings (Fuller et al., ; Geremia et al., ). This indicates the potential for the disease to have as much of an effect on reducing pregnancy as severe winters or droughts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…By our estimation, this would suggest that seropositive elk produce approximately 24% fewer calves than seronegative elk (see ). Similar reductions in pregnancy and recruitment attributable to brucellosis have been found for bison in Yellowstone, which lend additional support to our findings (Fuller et al., ; Geremia et al., ). This indicates the potential for the disease to have as much of an effect on reducing pregnancy as severe winters or droughts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite these criticisms and disparate findings, we encourage continued site-specific investigations of the relative influences of habitat conditions and antipredator responses on the body condition and probability of pregnancy in elk because, theoretically, the consequences of antipredator responses that carry nutritional costs could approach the consequences of direct predation Christianson 2008, Peckarsky et al 2008). Future studies should consider factors in addition to predation that could lower pregnancy rates in elk, including climate and forage conditions (Peckarsky et al 2008), an aging population (White and Garrott 2005), interactions among nutrition, condition, and lactation (Cook et al 2004a, b), low breeding bull : female ratios (Raedeke et al 2002), and diseases such as brucellosis (Geremia et al 2009, Rhyan et al 2009) that are increasing in prevalence in some areas (Cross et al 2010). The Yellowstone wolf saga has become an exemplar of the ecological consequences of large predator restoration, which is likely to guide science and policy regarding such intentional introductions.…”
Section: P J White Et Al 6 Ecological Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through nutritional and thermoregulatory mechanisms, a warming climate (see Fig. 1 Larter et al 2000, Fuller et al 2007a, Geremia et al 2009). The high rates of extraction (up to 32%) that keep the HM population below its carrying capacity undoubtedly diminish intrinsic feedbacks, but the relative lack of disease and severe winter snowpack might also be contributing factors (Geremia et al 2009, Plumb et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Larter et al 2000, Fuller et al 2007a, Geremia et al 2009). The high rates of extraction (up to 32%) that keep the HM population below its carrying capacity undoubtedly diminish intrinsic feedbacks, but the relative lack of disease and severe winter snowpack might also be contributing factors (Geremia et al 2009, Plumb et al 2009). Although it was once thought that large animals like bison should experience strong density dependence because of K-selection (Pianka 1970), these ideas have since been replaced (see Reznick et al 2002), and recent evidence suggests that long-lived species actually tend to experience weaker density dependence than short-lived species (Herrando-Pe´rez et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation