1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)60050-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 14 Retail Environments and Spatial Shopping Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the multi-step approach extends the more simplistic models, there is little evidence of attempts to investigate process-based models in the retail literature. As seen in Retailer image research is an area with a long history of examining customer perceptions of retail stores as well as whole chains (Keaveney and Hunt, 1992;Lindquist, 1974;Martineau, 1958;Timmermans, 1993). Despite the extant literature, conceptualization and measurement of retailer image remains elusive.…”
Section: Brand Equity and Retailer Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the multi-step approach extends the more simplistic models, there is little evidence of attempts to investigate process-based models in the retail literature. As seen in Retailer image research is an area with a long history of examining customer perceptions of retail stores as well as whole chains (Keaveney and Hunt, 1992;Lindquist, 1974;Martineau, 1958;Timmermans, 1993). Despite the extant literature, conceptualization and measurement of retailer image remains elusive.…”
Section: Brand Equity and Retailer Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1960s, store image has been the main research focus for understanding customers' perceptions of retail stores and retail chains (Delgado-Ballester et al, 2014;Keaveney and Hunt, 1992;Lindquist, 1974;Oppewal and Timmermans, 1997;Timmermans, 1993). A vast number of models have been developed over the years and there does not seem to be any common framework or agreed-upon model.…”
Section: Store and Retail Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a utility-maximizing decision rule is assumed, which implies that the probability of choosing some choice alternative is equal to the probability that the utility associated with a particular choice alternative exceeds that of all other choice alternatives included in the choice set (MacFadden, 1991). The specification of the choice model then depends on the assumptions regarding the distributions of the random utility components; it is assumed that random utility components are independent (Timmermans, 1993). It is also assumed that the errors in the model have a double exponential distribution.…”
Section: Conjoint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%