2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8531-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 15 The Chemistry and Biology of Light-Harvesting Complex II and Thylakoid Biogenesis: raison d’etre of Chlorophylls b and c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, at the end of the RDI application period, the ratio Chl-a/Chl-b showed lower values in RDI treatments with higher water deprivation. This fact may be explained in terms of differential stability of these pigments -under abiotic stress conditions -which could affect the stability of light-harvesting complexes involved in light absorption (Hoober et al, 2010) and, consequently, the photosynthetic rate. 10.8 a,A ± 1.95 14.1 b,A ± 4.75 14.3 b,A ± 3.70 15.1 b,A ± 2.21 18.5 c,A ± 5.84 Car IV 7.18 a,B ± 0.74 7.23 a,B ± 0.44 7.56 a,B ± 0.47 7.45 a,B ± 0.34 7.44 a,A ± 0.37 EV 5.04 a,A ± 0.47 6.29 b,A ± 1.81 6.17 c,A ± 1.48 6.46 c,A ± 0.73 7.77 c,A ± 2.36 Total Phae IV 13.4 a,B ± 0.58 13.1 a,B ± 0.70 13.7 a,B ± 0.59 13.6 a,B ± 0.84 13.5 a,A ± 0.87 EV 7.61 a,A ± 1.93 10.7 b,A ± 3.56 10.9 b,A ± 2.93 11.9 b,A ± 2.23 14.6 c,A ± 4.21 Phae/Chl IV 0.79 a,B ± 0.03 0.77 a,A ± 0.04 0.78 a,A ± 0.03 0.79 a,A ± 0.05 0.78 a,A ± 0.03 EV 0.73 a,A ± 0.11 0.76 ab,A ± 0.05 0.76 ab,A ± 0.04 0.78 b,A ± 0.06 0.80 b,A ± 0.06…”
Section: Biochemical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, at the end of the RDI application period, the ratio Chl-a/Chl-b showed lower values in RDI treatments with higher water deprivation. This fact may be explained in terms of differential stability of these pigments -under abiotic stress conditions -which could affect the stability of light-harvesting complexes involved in light absorption (Hoober et al, 2010) and, consequently, the photosynthetic rate. 10.8 a,A ± 1.95 14.1 b,A ± 4.75 14.3 b,A ± 3.70 15.1 b,A ± 2.21 18.5 c,A ± 5.84 Car IV 7.18 a,B ± 0.74 7.23 a,B ± 0.44 7.56 a,B ± 0.47 7.45 a,B ± 0.34 7.44 a,A ± 0.37 EV 5.04 a,A ± 0.47 6.29 b,A ± 1.81 6.17 c,A ± 1.48 6.46 c,A ± 0.73 7.77 c,A ± 2.36 Total Phae IV 13.4 a,B ± 0.58 13.1 a,B ± 0.70 13.7 a,B ± 0.59 13.6 a,B ± 0.84 13.5 a,A ± 0.87 EV 7.61 a,A ± 1.93 10.7 b,A ± 3.56 10.9 b,A ± 2.93 11.9 b,A ± 2.23 14.6 c,A ± 4.21 Phae/Chl IV 0.79 a,B ± 0.03 0.77 a,A ± 0.04 0.78 a,A ± 0.03 0.79 a,A ± 0.05 0.78 a,A ± 0.03 EV 0.73 a,A ± 0.11 0.76 ab,A ± 0.05 0.76 ab,A ± 0.04 0.78 b,A ± 0.06 0.80 b,A ± 0.06…”
Section: Biochemical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) causes a blue shift of the maximum absorption Q y band to 647 nm (in methanol; Table 1). These shifts can be understood in terms of the position of the electronegative formyl group on the different molecular axes and the effect that this has on the electron density distribution of the tetrapyrrole macrocycle changes (Hoober, Eggink & Chen 2007; Hoober et al . 2010).…”
Section: The Concept Of Adaptational Side Chain Substitutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%