2018
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 2 Epidemiology of sarcopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(125 reference statements)
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AWGS pre‐sarcopenia was defined as ASMI less than the cut‐off value only. AWGS robust was defined as the remaining participants . Total body fat mass (kg), minerals (kg) and protein (kg) were also determined by the InBody720, divided by the height (m) squared, and utilized as indicators of nutritional status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AWGS pre‐sarcopenia was defined as ASMI less than the cut‐off value only. AWGS robust was defined as the remaining participants . Total body fat mass (kg), minerals (kg) and protein (kg) were also determined by the InBody720, divided by the height (m) squared, and utilized as indicators of nutritional status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, in October 2016, sarcopenia was included in the ICD‐10 (M62.84) and was internationally recognized as a disease . The Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty and the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology jointly published clinical guidelines for sarcopenia in 2017, which have been translated into English . Nevertheless, a large number of research groups exist worldwide, and their definitions and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia vary.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty and the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology jointly published clinical guidelines for sarcopenia in 2017, which have been translated into English. [5][6][7][8] Nevertheless, a large number of research groups exist worldwide, and their definitions and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia vary. Although skeletal muscle mass is an indispensable criterion for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, reduced muscle strength (grip strength) and/or reduced physical function (walking speed) are adopted, as required, when diagnosing muscular functions.…”
Section: Background and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) is not only related to age and sex but also depends on a number of endogenous and exogenous factors that influence the prevalence values of sarcopenia. The most studied and validated factors that can generate an effect on the sarcopenia are age (main moderating variable), genetic factors, birth weight, early growth, diet, physical activity, other chronic diseases, and hormonal changes (secondary variables) [17,18]. In line with this, a recent systematic review with meta-analysis on the general population [2] concludes that the prevalence of sarcopenia can be modified by other factors such as race, nutrition, quality of life, and sex among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%