2010
DOI: 10.1159/000301158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 2: Introduction

Abstract: The 12th Annual Report from the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) contains analyses of data submitted from every centre providing clinical supervision of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and (via the Scottish Renal Registry) Scotland. The data are largely extracted direct from clinical information systems used for direct clinical care [1] and the inclusion of laboratory data permit analyses not only of the incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of RRT in the UK, but also the achievement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of data on the centre level case-mix makes interpretation of any apparent difference in survival between centres and UK countries difficult. Despite the uncertainty about apparent differences in outcome, any centre which appears to be an outlier will be subject to the UKRR clinical governance procedures as set out in chapter 2 of the 2009 UKRR Report [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of data on the centre level case-mix makes interpretation of any apparent difference in survival between centres and UK countries difficult. Despite the uncertainty about apparent differences in outcome, any centre which appears to be an outlier will be subject to the UKRR clinical governance procedures as set out in chapter 2 of the 2009 UKRR Report [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of information on casemix makes interpretation of any apparent difference in survival between centres difficult. Despite the uncertainty about any apparent differences in outcome, for centres which appear to be outliers the UKRR will follow the clinical governance procedures as set out in chapter 2 of the 2009 UKRR Report [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of data on the centre level case-mix makes interpretation of any apparent difference in survival between centres and UK countries difficult. Despite the uncertainty about apparent differences in outcome, any centre which appears to be an outlier will be subject to the UKRR clinical governance procedures as set out in chapter 2 of the 2009 UKRR Annual Report [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%