2011
DOI: 10.1075/dapsac.42.06mon
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 2. The accountability interview, politics and change in UK public service broadcasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is yet more to explore with regard to the diversity and ongoing transformations of journalistic identities that are perhaps more clearly displayed in other types of broadcast news settings. A contribution in this direction is the current research focusing on an argumentative journalism in which questions and answers have been partly replaced by assertions and counter-assertions, and where journalists explicitly depart from the formal neutral position observed in previous research (Patrona 2011;Hutchby 2011;Montgomery 2011). The present study of expert dialogues between journalists is yet another attempt to explore the multiplicity of journalistic identities in news broadcasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is yet more to explore with regard to the diversity and ongoing transformations of journalistic identities that are perhaps more clearly displayed in other types of broadcast news settings. A contribution in this direction is the current research focusing on an argumentative journalism in which questions and answers have been partly replaced by assertions and counter-assertions, and where journalists explicitly depart from the formal neutral position observed in previous research (Patrona 2011;Hutchby 2011;Montgomery 2011). The present study of expert dialogues between journalists is yet another attempt to explore the multiplicity of journalistic identities in news broadcasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Questioning practice in news interviews has long been a central interest of linguists and other social scientists exploring the role of journalists in performing and maintaining journalistic ethical norms. In particular, neutralism and adversarialism as the twin journalistic codes have been widely researched in studies of news interviews (Clayman 1988, 1992, 1993, 2002, Clayman & Heritage 2002a, 2002b, Eströma 2009, Heritage 1985, Montgomery 2007, 2008, 2011, Rendle-Short 2007 and the focus of such research is the collaboration of question-answer turn-taking. On the one hand, the primary requirement for a journalist is to maintain his or her neutral posture in professional practice, and the basic issues are usually initiated and realized through question-answer H Z T C 6 activities; on the other hand, news interview questioning is not -and cannot be -strictly neutral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in Clayman and Heritage (2002a), both in America and Britain, although diff erences and similarities exist when comparing their trajectories of development, the style of news interviews has generally changed from being deferential to being adversarial. As to the generic evolution of the news interview, Montgomery (2011) maintained that the news interview in Britain is also shifting towards 'argument.' These assertions are drawn in principle on the examination of interviewer-interviewee interactions in news interview programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are characterised by a lack of neutrality and 'interview-like talk that is recursively in breach of that primary norm' (ibid). According to Hutchby, the HPI shares many features of the adversarial 'accountability interview' (Montgomery 2011) but can be characterised as 'hybrid' not only by its interdiscursivity, 'shifting between speech exchange systems otherwise associated with non-interview settings' (Hutchby 2011: 116), but also by the interviewer's licence to personalise arguments. HPIs are also characterised by the interviewer tending to 'foreground his or her agency as a spokesperson 'for' certain political stances or social forces' and finally, by the interviewer taking licence 'to engage in belligerent and emotionally heightened episodes of direct confrontation with the interviewee' (Ibid).…”
Section: The Newsnight Interviewmentioning
confidence: 99%