Minority Language Media 2007
DOI: 10.21832/9781853599651-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 4. The Media and Language Maintenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, we have illustrated that crowdsourcing speech data using smartphones is a useful method for low-resource languages to develop resources for computational methods [10,11]. Given the support of a few high-resource languages in commercial companies, smaller languages who wish to ensure digital vitality may source data from the language community to collect low-cost large data sets for the development of language technologies [3,5,6,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, we have illustrated that crowdsourcing speech data using smartphones is a useful method for low-resource languages to develop resources for computational methods [10,11]. Given the support of a few high-resource languages in commercial companies, smaller languages who wish to ensure digital vitality may source data from the language community to collect low-cost large data sets for the development of language technologies [3,5,6,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, small and low-resource languages may find themselves marginalized in terms of the availability of digital resources, leaving speakers at risk of being excluded economically and socially. The importance of electronic technologies in smaller languages is argued to be essential for ensuring a language progresses and avoids digital extinction [5][6][7]. The risk of digital extinction to smaller languages has featured extensively in the European Digital Language Diversity Project (DLDP).…”
Section: Challenges For Speech Technology and Low-resource Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have suggested instead that language may fulfil symbolic rather than informative functions, such as media branding (Narbaiza et al 2013) or standing as a symbol of ethnic belonging (Dolowy-Rybinska 2013), prestige (Smith 2016) or "cool" (Maher 2005 (Ang et al 2002;Gillespie 1995;Hargreaves 2001;Hargreaves & Mahdjoub 1997;Madianou 2005;Milikowski 2001;Rios & Gaines 1997, 1998and Wilkin et al 2007) that few ethnic minority groups consume media only in their minority languagemost also use dominant language media. Indeed, Cormack (2007) rightly asks: why do bilingual audience members choose to consume their media in one language or another? Markelin and Husband (2013) and Husband (2005) further demonstrate that it can be difficult in practice to prioritise language preservation when an ethnic minority group is fractured by diverse languages and cultures (as are Pacific peoples in New Zealand).…”
Section: Pacific Media In Aotearoa New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scheme, media are a vital tool to enhance and develop linguistic resources and expand the speech community (cf. Cormack 2007; Hourigan 2007) – they are an internal tool for managing within the community. Language is perceived as valuable and instrumental for community survival and a primary marker of a speaker's identity.…”
Section: The Service Eramentioning
confidence: 99%