2006
DOI: 10.3102/0091732x030001109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 4: Validity in Educational Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sociocultural perspectives focus assessment attention on how learning and its motivations, development and expression are mediated by the social, material, temporal, historical and cultural setting in which they are taking place (Wertsch, 1991). The social and cultural processes and consequences of learning and assessment for student learning as well as student learning identities and identifications with subject matter (the disciplines) as meaningful and important for their lives and development are foregrounded (Cowie, 2005;Moss, Girard, & Haniford, 2006). In the following quote, Moss (2008) establishes concepts critical to our view of classroom assessment as a social and cultural practice with social consequences for student identities as learners and knowers:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sociocultural perspectives focus assessment attention on how learning and its motivations, development and expression are mediated by the social, material, temporal, historical and cultural setting in which they are taking place (Wertsch, 1991). The social and cultural processes and consequences of learning and assessment for student learning as well as student learning identities and identifications with subject matter (the disciplines) as meaningful and important for their lives and development are foregrounded (Cowie, 2005;Moss, Girard, & Haniford, 2006). In the following quote, Moss (2008) establishes concepts critical to our view of classroom assessment as a social and cultural practice with social consequences for student identities as learners and knowers:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The implementation of NCLB in the USA-like its UK and, now quite similarly, Australian counterparts-has raised technical issues of sociodemographic classification and the definition of target populations (Lucas and Beresford 2010), construct definition (Rochex 2006), measurement validity and reliability (Moss et al 2006;Stobart 2008). Nonetheless, post-NCLB data points to two problem scenarios.…”
Section: Autonomous and Ideological Models Of Literacymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the educational assessment community, there is debate regarding assessment validity (Moss, Girard, & Haniford, 2006). Some experts fear that a prescriptive approach to validity documentation limits the generative context and flexibility required for meaningful scientific investigation.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 lists a range of validity measures that will be pursued. This thorough and systematic approach to establishing validity will allow the research team to develop, analyze, and integrate multiple types of evidence at varying levels of scale (Moss et al, 2006).…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%