Chapter 45 A history of Russian and Soviet neuro(patho)logy

Lichterman, Boleslav

doi:10.1016/s0072-9752(08)02145-3

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jahrhunderts mit wissenschaftlichen Entdeckungen, Publikationen und Lehrbüchern eigene Impulse. Wenngleich Vorarbeiten zum deutsch-russischen Wissenschaftsaustausch der Fachgebiete Psychiatrie und Neurologie nur in überschaubarer Anzahl vorhanden sind, tendieren deren Kernaussagen in dieselbe Richtung [25][26][27].…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Russische Psychiater und Neurologen im 19. Jahrhundert an deutschen Universitäten

Engmann¹

2019

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungBislang liegt nur eine kleine Anzahl von Publikationen vor, die überblicksartig den deutsch-russischen Wissenschaftsaustausch im 19. Jahrhundert beleuchten. Im Rahmen der Auswertung eines biobibliographischen Lexikons, das innerhalb des Projektes der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften „Wissenschaftsbeziehungen im 19. Jahrhundert zwischen Deutschland und Russland auf den Gebieten Chemie, Pharmazie und Medizin“ erstellt wurde, konnte nun erstmals anhand von 357 Psychiatern und Neurologen des 19. Jahrhunderts jener Wissenschaftsaustausch detailliert untersucht werden. Der vorliegende Artikel stellt gewissenmaßen ein Exzerpt dieser Arbeit dar. Es zeigt sich, dass die russischen Vertreter beider Fachgebiete zwar sehr häufig an deutschen Kliniken hospitierten, diese Aufenthalte aber den Auftakt für eine eigenständig russische Entwicklung der beiden Fachgebiete lieferten, die die Wissenschaft mit eigenen Innovationen sowohl fachlich als auch organisatorisch bereicherte.

show abstract

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Russische Psychiater und Neurologen im 19. Jahrhundert an deutschen Universitäten

Engmann¹

2019

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Russia, the term “neuropathologist” describes physicians who elsewhere are called neurologists. The term “neuromorphologist” may include pathologists who study the nervous system or anatomical researchers . Pathology training consists of a 2‐year “ordinatura” regulated by the Ministry of Health.…”

Section: Np Training As a Medical Subspecialtymentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuropathology Training Worldwide—Evolution and Comparisons

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Training of neuropathologists varies worldwide. Systems range from highly organized specialist and subspecialist education with national certification, to regulated training with diploma recognition, to informal apprenticeships in neurological hospitals and no formal recognition. This overview compiles and summarizes the history of regulated training systems, the status of neuropathology within various countries' medical systems and the manner in which neuropathologists are trained. Anecdotal evidence suggests that countries with regulated systems of neuropathology training and an active professional organization are more likely to have an adequate supply of diagnostic specialists and a vibrant research community. The different training systems reflect the style of medical services delivery in the respective countries. In general, the existence of formal neuropathology training systems occurs only in countries with relatively high levels of per capita health expenditures, reflecting the development of medical specialization overall. Evolving diagnostic technologies and major international research endeavors, whose goals are to understand structure and function of the human brain, demand that neuropathology training is more than simply diagnostic histopathology.

show abstract

“…This is how he, Charcot’s devoted disciple, preferred to call the discipline – a term that would be used in Russia (and later, Soviet Union) for many decades thereafter. It was not until 1882 that Charcot was appointed Chair of the Study of Diseases of the Nervous System [6,9]. Kozhevnikov was a faithful follower of Charcot’s anatomoclinical approach.…”

Section: Pupilsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Jean-Martin Charcot at the Birth of Russian Neurology

Vein¹

2011

Eur Neurol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Russian neurology was virtually nonexistent in the middle of the 19th century which made a traineeship abroad an absolute necessity. Charcot and his school did not just offer professional training, but created the best minds, which would determine the direction of neurology and psychiatry in Russia for many decades. After returning home, young Russian doctors not only implemented everything they had learned in Western Europe, but proceeded to make their own original contributions. The most talented pupils of Charcot, including such prominent names as Kozhevnikov, Korsakov, Minor, Bekhterev and Darkshevich, became the founders of neurological schools in Russia. They laid the basis for the further development of neurology and psychiatry. Remarkably, though trained by the same teachers, each of these future ‘founding fathers’ of these neurological and psychiatric schools followed his own individual path which resulted in an undeniable diversity in Russian neurology and psychiatry during the period of their formation.

show abstract

Chapter 45 A history of Russian and Soviet neuro(patho)logy

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Russische Psychiater und Neurologen im 19. Jahrhundert an deutschen Universitäten

Russische Psychiater und Neurologen im 19. Jahrhundert an deutschen Universitäten

Neuropathology Training Worldwide—Evolution and Comparisons

Jean-Martin Charcot at the Birth of Russian Neurology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About