1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6417(08)60044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 5: Multi-Squid Devices and Their Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New uses of multi-SQUID devices are to be expected now that more reliable and higher-sensitivity sensors have become available, and at a lower cost than before . For exam-pie, geomagnetic instruments (for reviews, see Clarke, 1983 andIlmoniemi et al , 1989) and magnetic monopole detectors (Cabrera, 1982;Tesche et al , 1983) have been used for some time already.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New uses of multi-SQUID devices are to be expected now that more reliable and higher-sensitivity sensors have become available, and at a lower cost than before . For exam-pie, geomagnetic instruments (for reviews, see Clarke, 1983 andIlmoniemi et al , 1989) and magnetic monopole detectors (Cabrera, 1982;Tesche et al , 1983) have been used for some time already.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be practical, this application requires a measurement system capable of extensively mapping the biomagnetic field distribution in a short period of time. For this reason, the incorporation of a large number of magnetic field sensors to form multichannel systems has been the preferred approach [4]. Since the magnitude of the biomagnetic fields of interest can be as low as a few tens of fT, it is generally regarded [2] that the sensors must have a minimum magnetic field noise & B of 10 m Hz-112 or better down to 1 Hz.…”
Section: An Important Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the preamplifier used in their electronics contributed a voltage noise of only 1. 4 nV Hz"12, the performance of their DC SQUID at that time was such that the voltage-flux transfer function aV/a@ N 2 pV (Do at the optimal operating point. Direct coupling of the SQUID to the preamplifier would therefore have resulted in a contribution from the electronics to the flux noise = * " ( l aV/a(D l)-' of 7 x HZ"'~, a totally unacceptable value for applications.…”
Section: An Important Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details, the reader is referred to several past and recent reviews and references therein [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%