Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
People of ancient Chinese states appear to have been asymmetrically dependent on their lords since the fourth century BCE for three reasons: because they were ranked according to merit; because they could be sentenced to forced or convict labor; and because they were seen as and managed like a resource by their landlords. Instead of describing such states as all-encompassing slave societies based on state slavery, this article argues that it is more useful to examine structures of dependency and to identify the organizing principles on which they were based. In ancient China, such principles were formulated in the fourth and third centuries BCE as part of an emerging reflection on principles of “laws and procedures” (fashu 法術). Early Chinese “specialists in laws and procedures” (fashu zhi shi 法術之士), as they called themselves, were not only familiar with concepts such as division of labor, economic cycles, supply and demand, incentives, or contrarian investment, but they also thought about resources and their management. The article explores this subject primarily through the economic thought of Shang jun shu 商君書 (The Documents Pertaining to the Lord of Shang), a collection of treatises dating from about 360 to 210 BCE on radical administrative reforms designed to increase the productivity and efficiency of subjects in the fields of agriculture and warfare.
People of ancient Chinese states appear to have been asymmetrically dependent on their lords since the fourth century BCE for three reasons: because they were ranked according to merit; because they could be sentenced to forced or convict labor; and because they were seen as and managed like a resource by their landlords. Instead of describing such states as all-encompassing slave societies based on state slavery, this article argues that it is more useful to examine structures of dependency and to identify the organizing principles on which they were based. In ancient China, such principles were formulated in the fourth and third centuries BCE as part of an emerging reflection on principles of “laws and procedures” (fashu 法術). Early Chinese “specialists in laws and procedures” (fashu zhi shi 法術之士), as they called themselves, were not only familiar with concepts such as division of labor, economic cycles, supply and demand, incentives, or contrarian investment, but they also thought about resources and their management. The article explores this subject primarily through the economic thought of Shang jun shu 商君書 (The Documents Pertaining to the Lord of Shang), a collection of treatises dating from about 360 to 210 BCE on radical administrative reforms designed to increase the productivity and efficiency of subjects in the fields of agriculture and warfare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.