Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication 2022
DOI: 10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 7: Applied Rhetoric as Disciplinary Umbrella: Community, Connections, and Identity

Abstract: The WAC Clearinghouse supports teachers of writing across the disciplines. Hosted by Colorado State University, and supported by the Colorado State University Open Press, it brings together scholarly journals and book series as well as resources for teachers who use writing in their courses. This book is available in digital formats for free download at wac.colostate.edu.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 187 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selber (2004) outlined key features of the postcritical approach, notably combining the pragmatic acceptance of technology in instructional contexts with a critical understanding of its social implications (p. 8). Much in this same vein, scholars have recently linked postcritical approaches with “engaged” rhetorics that support civic and interdisciplinary service (Herndl, 2017, p. 10) as well as “applied rhetoric” (Veltsos et al, 2021, p. 203) and new-materialist rhetorics (Olman & Boyle, 2017, p. 10). In their introduction to a collection focused on postcritical rhetorics, Olman and Boyle (2017) suggested that these methods can “help humans and nonhumans live justly together in uncertainty” (p. 3), which shows how postcritical approaches have evolved in the two decades since they were mainstreamed into our work: from pragmatic acceptance of nonhumans to their full inclusion as first-class citizens in our classrooms.…”
Section: Framing Our Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selber (2004) outlined key features of the postcritical approach, notably combining the pragmatic acceptance of technology in instructional contexts with a critical understanding of its social implications (p. 8). Much in this same vein, scholars have recently linked postcritical approaches with “engaged” rhetorics that support civic and interdisciplinary service (Herndl, 2017, p. 10) as well as “applied rhetoric” (Veltsos et al, 2021, p. 203) and new-materialist rhetorics (Olman & Boyle, 2017, p. 10). In their introduction to a collection focused on postcritical rhetorics, Olman and Boyle (2017) suggested that these methods can “help humans and nonhumans live justly together in uncertainty” (p. 3), which shows how postcritical approaches have evolved in the two decades since they were mainstreamed into our work: from pragmatic acceptance of nonhumans to their full inclusion as first-class citizens in our classrooms.…”
Section: Framing Our Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%