Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances 2008
DOI: 10.7312/pere12916-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 7. Empirical Approaches to Modeling Wildland Fire in the Pacific Northwest Region of the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, natural disturbance regimes differ with respect to the complexity of their structural legacies and it is likely that the level of detail necessary to effectively characterize these regimes will also differ. For example, mixed-severity fire regimes result in greater spatial patchiness and temporal variability than high-or low-severity regimes (Agee, 1998;McKenzie et al, 2004;Lentile et al, 2006). Even in forest ecosystems where high-and lowseverity fire regimes are being emulated, the silvicultural induction of spatial heterogeneity in young stands represents a necessary stand structural detail (e.g., Long and Smith, 2000;Carey, 2003).…”
Section: What Is To Be Emulated?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clearly, natural disturbance regimes differ with respect to the complexity of their structural legacies and it is likely that the level of detail necessary to effectively characterize these regimes will also differ. For example, mixed-severity fire regimes result in greater spatial patchiness and temporal variability than high-or low-severity regimes (Agee, 1998;McKenzie et al, 2004;Lentile et al, 2006). Even in forest ecosystems where high-and lowseverity fire regimes are being emulated, the silvicultural induction of spatial heterogeneity in young stands represents a necessary stand structural detail (e.g., Long and Smith, 2000;Carey, 2003).…”
Section: What Is To Be Emulated?mentioning
confidence: 97%