1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63324-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 8 Ibotenic acid lesions of the superior colliculus produce longer lasting deficits in visual orienting behavior than aspiration lesions in the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crossed tectoreticular pathway has been suggested to be involved in the control of orienting responses based on the following evidence: (1) repetitive electrical stimulation of the SC induces contraversive orienting responses (Cowie and Robinson, 1994; Corneil et al, 2002) and that of the medial pontomedullary reticular formation induces ipsiversive orienting responses (Cowie and Robinson, 1994); (2) lesion or reversible inactivation of the SC (Rosenquist et al, 1996; Quaia et al, 1998) or medial pontomedullary reticular formation (Isa and Sasaki, 1988) impairs orienting responses; (3) single unit recordings either from the SC (Sparks, 1975, 1978) or the medial pontomedullary reticular formation (Grantyn and Berthoz, 1987; Isa and Naito, 1995; Isa and Sasaki, 2002) reveal the existence of neurons that show increased firing preceding the orienting response; and (4) anatomically, the medial pontomedullary reticular formation receives massive inputs from the intermediate and deep layers of the contralateral SC (Kawamura and Brodal, 1973; Huerta and Harting, 1982). Thus, there is overwhelming evidence that the tectoreticular pathway plays a major role in the control of orienting responses (Sparks, 1986; Isa and Sasaki, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crossed tectoreticular pathway has been suggested to be involved in the control of orienting responses based on the following evidence: (1) repetitive electrical stimulation of the SC induces contraversive orienting responses (Cowie and Robinson, 1994; Corneil et al, 2002) and that of the medial pontomedullary reticular formation induces ipsiversive orienting responses (Cowie and Robinson, 1994); (2) lesion or reversible inactivation of the SC (Rosenquist et al, 1996; Quaia et al, 1998) or medial pontomedullary reticular formation (Isa and Sasaki, 1988) impairs orienting responses; (3) single unit recordings either from the SC (Sparks, 1975, 1978) or the medial pontomedullary reticular formation (Grantyn and Berthoz, 1987; Isa and Naito, 1995; Isa and Sasaki, 2002) reveal the existence of neurons that show increased firing preceding the orienting response; and (4) anatomically, the medial pontomedullary reticular formation receives massive inputs from the intermediate and deep layers of the contralateral SC (Kawamura and Brodal, 1973; Huerta and Harting, 1982). Thus, there is overwhelming evidence that the tectoreticular pathway plays a major role in the control of orienting responses (Sparks, 1986; Isa and Sasaki, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also sought to determine the impact of unilateral and bilateral collicular deactivations on the analyses of visual and aural space. Previous studies have shown that unilateral collicular destruction induces a neglect of visual stimuli introduced into the contralateral visual field (Sprague et al, 1961; Sprague and Meikle, 1965; Rosenquist et al, 1996); a result confirmed by cooling deactivation (Lomber et al, 1996; Payne et al, 1996). However, contrary to expectation, additional cooling of the opposite superior colliculus reverses the initial deficit and orienting performance is virtually normal in both hemifields (Lomber and Payne, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Evidence from animal models suggests that many of the behavioural sequelae associated with visual neglect may result not solely from the size of the lesion, but also from a pathological state of increased inhibition exerted on the damaged hemisphere by the contralesional hemisphere [29,33,53,59]. In 1966 Sprague [59] first described the effect that now bears his name: neglect induced by a cortical lesion can be cancelled by a contralateral lesion of the midbrain superior colliculus.This phenomenon is broadly consistent with the Kinsbourne's theory [25], according to which transcallosal inhibitory networks in humans potentiate rival mechanisms in neural circuits in the two hemispheres to permit visuospatial redirection of attention to emerge.…”
Section: Competing Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%