The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann 2011
DOI: 10.1515/9783110254181.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 8: Nicolai Hartmann’s Approach to Affectivity and Its Relevance for the Current Debate Over Feelings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21][22] 2010 1887-1967) i R. G. Collingwood (1889Collingwood ( -1943. The work of W. Chołostiakow had no impact on modifications I made to the 2010 version of my own paper recently.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22] 2010 1887-1967) i R. G. Collingwood (1889Collingwood ( -1943. The work of W. Chołostiakow had no impact on modifications I made to the 2010 version of my own paper recently.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But those who do interest them-selves in links between emotions and materialities investigate fascinating matters such as affective objects (see e.g., Schreirer & Picard, 2000), relational artefacts and evocative objects (Turkle, 2007(Turkle, , 2011. Using Hartmann's approach and his hierarchy of effectivity (see e.g., Zaborowsky, 2011) researchers strive to understand emotive energies discharged by properties and objects, based on an approach which combines language and materiality with theories of affect and subjectivity (Navaro-Yashin, 2009) or how the affective capacity of some objects is sustained over time (Börjesson, n.d.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%