2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1874-5997(08)00009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 9 The Western Interior Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9B,D); while aragonitic fauna still show a limited range, the difference between both bivalve groups is less pronounced. This pattern also matches with the distribution of carbonate deposition within the WIS: the Cenomanian–Turonian interval experienced widespread carbonate sedimentation—in the form of the Greenhorn Limestone Formation—in the basin center (Miall et al 2008), while deposition in the basin center transitioned from limestones of the Niobrara Formation to the siliciclastic mudstones of the Pierre Shale in the early Campanian (McGookey et al 1972; Da Gama et al 2014). As our results confirm that carbonate environments can exacerbate the effects of aragonite dissolution, it is possible that the differences between the Cenomanian–Turonian and the Campanian are partially driven by the enhanced effects of aragonite bias in carbonate-rich environments, resulting in a lowered sampling probability within carbonate-dominated localities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…9B,D); while aragonitic fauna still show a limited range, the difference between both bivalve groups is less pronounced. This pattern also matches with the distribution of carbonate deposition within the WIS: the Cenomanian–Turonian interval experienced widespread carbonate sedimentation—in the form of the Greenhorn Limestone Formation—in the basin center (Miall et al 2008), while deposition in the basin center transitioned from limestones of the Niobrara Formation to the siliciclastic mudstones of the Pierre Shale in the early Campanian (McGookey et al 1972; Da Gama et al 2014). As our results confirm that carbonate environments can exacerbate the effects of aragonite dissolution, it is possible that the differences between the Cenomanian–Turonian and the Campanian are partially driven by the enhanced effects of aragonite bias in carbonate-rich environments, resulting in a lowered sampling probability within carbonate-dominated localities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Such interbasinal correlation diagrams are enormously useful for making stratigraphic comparisons between units and similar style diagrams have become commonplace in the geological literature. Recent, broad-scale correlations akin to that of Cobban and Reeside [ 1 ] are less common, but examples include Krystinik and DeJarnett [ 2 ], Sullivan and Lucas [ 3 , 4 ], Miall et al [ 5 ], and Roberts et al [ 6 ]. Construction of these kinds of correlation charts is built upon a great wealth of literature; the product of dedicated work by generations of stratigraphers working in the Western Interior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such example is the Panther Tongue Sandstone and Ferron Sandstone units of the Cretaceous Interior Seaway, which crop out in the Book Cliffs region of Utah, United States. Both units represent mouth bar deposition within fluvial-dominated deltas that filled the retro-foreland basin generated by the Sevier Orogeny (Miall, Catuneanu, Vakarelov, & Post, 2008). The Panther Tongue and Ferron Sandstone are of comparable thickness (20 m vs 16 m, respectively), and are thought deposited under similar provenance, climate and palaeogeographic conditions (Enge, Howell, & Buckley, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%