1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70629-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter III Inoculation Techniques—Effects Due to Quality and Quantity of Inoculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inoculum quantity of normally used is between 3% and 10% of the medium volume (Lincoln 1960, Meyrath and Suchanek 1972, Hunt and Stieber 1986. A relatively large inoculum volume may be used to generate the maximum production in as short a time as possible, thus increasing the vessel productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inoculum quantity of normally used is between 3% and 10% of the medium volume (Lincoln 1960, Meyrath and Suchanek 1972, Hunt and Stieber 1986. A relatively large inoculum volume may be used to generate the maximum production in as short a time as possible, thus increasing the vessel productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C alkanolyticum ATH3 (8.58±0.340 U) and CBH7 B. licheniformis (6.51±0.473 U) were found to be the highest at 3% inoculum size (Table 4). Inoculum quantity normally used is between 3% and 10% of the medium volume (Lincoln 1960;Meyrath & Suchanek 1972;Hunt & Stieber 1986). Lincoln (1960) stressed that bacterial inocula should be transferred in the logarithmic growth phase when the cells were still metabolically active.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used overnight culture technique may require passaging a sample through the chosen medium before inoculation (Meyrath & Suchanek 1972) so that (i) the micro-organism may be adapted from its environmental physiological state to that in the medium of choice and (ii) an approximate cell density can be predicted. Figure 3 illustrates how different the p t curves are if there is no passaging prior to inoculation into the calorimetric medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of inoculum density on microbial growth are well known (Dean & Hinshelwood 1966;Meyrath & Suchanek 1972;Pirt 1975;Pamment & Hall 1978). The known effects may limit the usefulness of the p-t curves as 'fingerprints' for identification purposes and illustrate the need for detailed investigation of the effects of inoculum density upon the derived p -t curves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%