The suitability of available formal tests for individuals from culturally deprived, poverty‐level backgrounds has long been open to criticism by test specialists. The present study is an attempt to overcome a number of the claimed defects for a variety of cognitive and noncognitive measures by (1) “Tailoring” a battery of measures specifically to disadvantaged adolescent groups and (2) demonstrating their value based upon their psychometric characteristics and the logic of various research‐related findings.
A battery of 13 measures was administered to 256 male and female high school dropouts enrolled in a federally funded youth‐work training program. Item characteristics, levels of internal consistency, external validity based upon rating criteria, construct validity based upon factor analysis and the logic of a number of research findings with the individual measures–all present a pattern of results reasonable enough to warrant continued research application and development of these types of measures for appraisal of disadvantaged adolescents.