Navigating Private and Public Healthcare 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9208-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter Twelve: The Marketisation of Aged Care: The Impact of Aged Care Reform in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High administrative burdens accompany policy and service redesign on the ground [ 10 ]. These phenomena can obstruct service providers from being able to engage with processes that build and equip future workforce/s – both current and emerging [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High administrative burdens accompany policy and service redesign on the ground [ 10 ]. These phenomena can obstruct service providers from being able to engage with processes that build and equip future workforce/s – both current and emerging [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical landscape of Australian residential aged care sector following reforms in 1997 has been heavily characterised by the privatisation of the sector. An absence of public transparency among providers is said to have perpetuated systemic issues exacerbated by the lack of staffing requirements and minimal funding accountability (Henderson & Willis, 2020). Similar to inquiries into failures of fundamental care in the United Kingdom (Francis, 2013) and Europe (van Achterberg et al, 2016), the Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (hereinto referred to as the Royal Commission) has revealed that the institutions and systems designed to provide care for vulnerable older people are often instead ‘cruel and harmful’; leaving the older person ‘isolated and powerless’ (Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, 2019, p. 1, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption is that older people are able to choose the care they wish to receive, have the funds to choose the optimum outcomes for themselves, are fully aware of what these choices include and have the capacity to change their mind if they are not happy with the choices that they have made (e.g. Henderson & Willis, 2020; Moberg, Blomqvist & Winblad, 2016). Yet, this assumption has been challenged with literature that has acknowledged that older people can be vulnerable when making choices as many may not be aware that they can make these choices or they may be unaware of the alternatives available to them (Dunér & Gustafsson, 2020; Henderson & Willis, 2020; Vamstad, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henderson & Willis, 2020; Moberg, Blomqvist & Winblad, 2016). Yet, this assumption has been challenged with literature that has acknowledged that older people can be vulnerable when making choices as many may not be aware that they can make these choices or they may be unaware of the alternatives available to them (Dunér & Gustafsson, 2020; Henderson & Willis, 2020; Vamstad, 2016). As such, the degree of vulnerability experienced by aged care consumers can limit their capacity to practise choice making over their preferred care services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%