1935
DOI: 10.1037/h0063322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character and personality tests.

Abstract: The growing interest in personality measurement is revealed in the increasing number of publications in this field. The present review includes tests and studies which have appeared during the year 1934. 1 I. SUMMARIES AND REVIEWS (A) Comprehensive Treatises. Symonds (204, 205) presents a comprehensive classification and description of tests, questionnaires, and rating scales in the field of personality. He also deals with the diagnosis of delinquent tendencies, vocational fitness and leadership, and problems … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1941
1941
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 230 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this article reviews only the literature on the validity of personality questionnaires, it might be well to mention here some of the surveys and bibliographic reviews which cover the general field of personality testing. These include studies by Allport (6); Allport and Vernon (10); Euros (40,41,42,43); Cattell (SO); Conklin (54,55); Darley and Anderson (64); Freeman (88); Guilford and Braley (103); Guilford (101); Hildreth (126); Horsch and Davis (129); Koos (159); Mailer (196,197,199,200); May, Hartshorne, and Welty (211,212,213); Murphy (223); Roback (250); Snyder (288); Symonds (301,303); Traxler (318,320,321,322); Watson (335,336,337,338,339); and the National Educational Association (358,359).…”
Section: Prevews Surveys and Reviews Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this article reviews only the literature on the validity of personality questionnaires, it might be well to mention here some of the surveys and bibliographic reviews which cover the general field of personality testing. These include studies by Allport (6); Allport and Vernon (10); Euros (40,41,42,43); Cattell (SO); Conklin (54,55); Darley and Anderson (64); Freeman (88); Guilford and Braley (103); Guilford (101); Hildreth (126); Horsch and Davis (129); Koos (159); Mailer (196,197,199,200); May, Hartshorne, and Welty (211,212,213); Murphy (223); Roback (250); Snyder (288); Symonds (301,303); Traxler (318,320,321,322); Watson (335,336,337,338,339); and the National Educational Association (358,359).…”
Section: Prevews Surveys and Reviews Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%