2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.10902
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charactering instrumental noises and stochastic gravitational wave signals from combined time-delay interferometry

Abstract: LISA will detect gravitational wave (GW) in the milli-Hz frequency band in space. Time-delay interferometry (TDI) is developed to suppress laser frequency noise beneath the acceleration noise and optical metrology noise. To identify stochastic GW signals, it would be required to characterize these noise components entangled in TDI data streams. In this work, we demonstrate noises characterization by combining the first-generation TDI channels from Michelson and Relay configurations. By assuming stationary Gaus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We want to reinforce that the upper and lower bounds we compute here are fully agnostic to the actual instrument performance and don't rely on any model of the individual noise spectral shapes or stationarities (with the aforementioned caveat that we still rely on specific assumptions on noise correlations). This is in contrast to some other results in the literature (see for instance [14][15][16]31]), which showed it is possible to put significantly more stringent bounds on the noise assuming stationarity over the whole mission duration and a fixed (and known) noise shape which only depends on a single amplitude parameter. If indeed such a priori knowledge of the noise level and shape were possible, it would be possible to resolve SGWB even below the threshold of the instrument noise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We want to reinforce that the upper and lower bounds we compute here are fully agnostic to the actual instrument performance and don't rely on any model of the individual noise spectral shapes or stationarities (with the aforementioned caveat that we still rely on specific assumptions on noise correlations). This is in contrast to some other results in the literature (see for instance [14][15][16]31]), which showed it is possible to put significantly more stringent bounds on the noise assuming stationarity over the whole mission duration and a fixed (and known) noise shape which only depends on a single amplitude parameter. If indeed such a priori knowledge of the noise level and shape were possible, it would be possible to resolve SGWB even below the threshold of the instrument noise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…On the contrary, we will show that TM acceleration noise is effectively suppressed in the ζ channel, such that it is dominated by OMS noise at all frequencies. This behaviour of the null channels has already been pointed out in [14,15] for the null channel T that is built out of X and the two channels Y and Z (obtained from X by cyclic satellite permutations), considering the case of LISA with equal arm-lengths. However, as already shown in [16] and [4], T as a null channel is strongly compromised when the arm lengths are not exactly equal, especially at low frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%