2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation and removal of recalcitrants in reverse osmosis concentrates from water reclamation plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional treatment processes, such as coagulation/flocculation and adsorption, have been widely investigated for removing EfOM from ROC due to their low cost and simplicity [16,17]. Dialynas et al [18] evaluated these conventional processes using alum (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ·18H 2 O), ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ), and granular activated carbon (GAC) for the treatment of ROC of membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional treatment processes, such as coagulation/flocculation and adsorption, have been widely investigated for removing EfOM from ROC due to their low cost and simplicity [16,17]. Dialynas et al [18] evaluated these conventional processes using alum (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ·18H 2 O), ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ), and granular activated carbon (GAC) for the treatment of ROC of membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results suggested that GAC and ferric chloride were promising as coagulants as their removal efficiencies of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were higher (91.3% and 52%, respectively) than the alum tested (42%) [19]. Bagastyo et al [16] reported that iron removed a wider molecular weight (MW) range of organics in ROC from coastal and inland streams than alum under optimal coagulation conditions (1.5 mM Al at pH 5 and 1.48 mM Fe at pH 5). Zhou et al [17] found that coupling pretreatment with ferric chloride could remove a large quantity of heavy MW organics from ROC that are highly resistant to the subsequent advanced oxidation process (95% removal by the FeCl 3 /UVC/TiO 2 system).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organics in ROC generated from PRW reclamation (PRW-ROC) need to be reduced to eliminate these negative impacts and to meet increasingly stringent discharge standards (Moreira et al 2017). Previous work has already investigated the use of physicochemical and biological treatments; however, low concentrations and biologically recalcitrant organic matter suggest these methods are unsuitable (Bagastyo et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organic contaminants in municipal RO effluents include natural organic matters (NOM), detergents, personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and so on [4]. AOPs include photooxidation, sonolysis, electrooxidation, Fenton's reaction, and photocatalysis [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Photooxidation and Fenton's reaction were reported to have relative medium to high costs of chemical consumables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%